Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the criteria for determining when a quantum field theory (QFT) is considered exactly solved. Participants explore various interpretations of "solved," including the completeness of eigenstates of the Hamiltonian and the implications of knowing the two-point function versus the four-point function in scattering scenarios.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants propose that having a complete set of eigenstates of the full interacting Hamiltonian indicates a QFT is exactly solved, allowing for analytical expressions of scattering scenarios.
- Others argue that knowing the two-point function alone is insufficient for a complete understanding of the theory, suggesting that the four-point function may be necessary for describing two-particle scattering.
- One participant mentions that in QED, there are only a few exact results, such as the pair creation probability in a constant electric field, which can be evaluated as a functional determinant.
- Another participant challenges the notion that anything is known exactly in QED, noting that the functional determinant only accounts for one-loop graphs without virtual photon exchanges.
- There is a reference to Schwinger's work on QED in 1+1 dimensions as a source of information regarding the two-point function and its implications for scattering amplitudes through the LSZ formalism.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on what constitutes an "exactly solved" QFT, with no consensus reached on the necessity of the two-point versus four-point function or the completeness of results in QED.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the dependence on definitions of "solved," the potential ambiguity in the necessity of different correlation functions, and the unresolved status of exact results in QED.