When Is a Quantum Field Theory Exactly Solved?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lester
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the criteria for determining when a quantum field theory (QFT) is considered exactly solved. Participants explore various interpretations of "solved," including the completeness of eigenstates of the Hamiltonian and the implications of knowing the two-point function versus the four-point function in scattering scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that having a complete set of eigenstates of the full interacting Hamiltonian indicates a QFT is exactly solved, allowing for analytical expressions of scattering scenarios.
  • Others argue that knowing the two-point function alone is insufficient for a complete understanding of the theory, suggesting that the four-point function may be necessary for describing two-particle scattering.
  • One participant mentions that in QED, there are only a few exact results, such as the pair creation probability in a constant electric field, which can be evaluated as a functional determinant.
  • Another participant challenges the notion that anything is known exactly in QED, noting that the functional determinant only accounts for one-loop graphs without virtual photon exchanges.
  • There is a reference to Schwinger's work on QED in 1+1 dimensions as a source of information regarding the two-point function and its implications for scattering amplitudes through the LSZ formalism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on what constitutes an "exactly solved" QFT, with no consensus reached on the necessity of the two-point versus four-point function or the completeness of results in QED.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of "solved," the potential ambiguity in the necessity of different correlation functions, and the unresolved status of exact results in QED.

Lester
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
A question I would like to get an answer is when is a QFT exactly solved? E.g. if I know the solution of the equation for the two-point function I have got all about the theory? This equation is classical in nature being the two-point function defined in the sense of distributions. I have read the original paper of Schwinger about QED2 and he does exactly this.

Jon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lester said:
A question I would like to get an answer is when is a QFT exactly solved?
One meaning of "solved" is that we have a complete set of eigenstates of the full
(interacting) Hamiltonian. I.e., one has "diagonalized" the interacting Hamiltonian.
With such a complete set, the properties of any scattering scenario or bound state can
be expressed analytically in closed form (exactly).

E.g. if I know the solution of the equation for the two-point function I have got
all about the theory?
That's not enough. But did you mean 2-point or 4-point? (Don't you need 4-point to
describe 2-particle scattering?)

This equation is classical in nature being the two-point function defined in the
sense of distributions. I have read the original paper of Schwinger about QED2 and
he does exactly this.
Could you give a more precise reference, pls?
 
I think that in QED there are only a few exact results, e.g. the exact expression for the pair creation probability per unit volume and time in a constant electric field. You can write this as a functional determinant and exactly evaluate it.
 
Count Iblis said:
I think that in QED there are only a few exact results, e.g. the exact expression for the pair creation probability per unit volume and time in a constant electric field. You can write this as a functional determinant and exactly evaluate it.

Nothing is known exactly in QED. The functional determinant only sums one-loop graphs (an electron-positron loop in the external field, but with no virtual photons exchanged).

There are a number of exact results in two spacetime dimensions, however.
 
About reference I mean the Schwinger's paper about QED in 1+1 dimensions (Phys. Rev. 128, 2425 (1962)) but I think that any reliable textbook should give the same information.

For a QFT generally a two-point function is enough to compute scattering amplitudes by LSZ formalism. This formalism is exact and should give also information about states and asymptotic states.

Jon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 182 ·
7
Replies
182
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K