When is the minimum polynomial of a scalar matrix kI equal to t-k?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The minimum polynomial of a scalar matrix \( A = kI \) is definitively \( m(t) = t - k \). This conclusion is established by proving two directions: first, if \( A = kI \), then \( (t - k)(A) = 0 \), confirming \( m(t) \) as minimal. Second, if \( m(t) = t - k \), then \( A - kI = 0 \), reinforcing that \( A \) must be a scalar matrix. Understanding the definitions of minimal polynomials and matrix properties is crucial for clarity in this topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scalar matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with minimal polynomials in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of polynomial roots and degrees
  • Basic concepts of matrix algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of scalar matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about minimal polynomials and their significance in matrix theory
  • Explore polynomial root-finding techniques
  • Investigate the relationship between matrix eigenvalues and minimal polynomials
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians focusing on matrix theory, and educators teaching polynomial concepts in mathematics.

Robb
Messages
225
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Show that A is a scalar matrix kI if and only if the minimum polynomial of A is m(t) = t-k

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


f(A) is monic
f(A) = 0 since A = kI

Next we must show that deg(g) < deg(f)

I guess I'm not sure where g comes from. Is it merely an assumption? I assume g is a polynomial with root A.
And, if deg(g) < deg(f) then deg(g) must be 0 because deg(f) is 1 so g must be a constant. I think I'm just having trouble wrapping my mind around g. Please advise.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Robb said:
I guess I'm not sure where g comes from
Neither am I. You throw in polynomials ##f(t)## and ##g(t)## without having expalined / defined them.
What does it mean for ##m(t)=t-k## being the minimal polynomial of ##A\,##?

We have two directions to prove, which you should clearly separate:
a) Given ##A=k\cdot I \,\Longrightarrow\, (t-k)(A) = 0\text{ minimal }##
b) Given ##m(t)=t-k \text{ minimal polynomial of }A \,\Longrightarrow \, A= k \cdot I##
 
On the one hand, if you observe ##m(A) = A - k\cdot I ##, this yields the zero matrix because of the assumption. So the minimal polynomial of ## A## must be ##t-k ##, there are no lower degree polynomials that could possibly work. Constants are not suitable.
Conversely, if ##t-k ## is the minimal polynomial of ##A ##, then by definition ##A - k\cdot I = 0 ##.

Word of advice. Always start from the definitions. Make sure you understand key concepts in this problem: matrices, (minimal) polynomials, root(s) of a polynomial. That way there will be no mysterious symbols ##f## and ## g## appearing out of nowhere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K