When should a Laboratory Log book be written?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the best practices for writing a laboratory log book during experiments. Participants emphasize that log books should be written in real-time as experiments are conducted, rather than recorded later. Key points include maintaining professionalism by avoiding whiteout and ensuring legibility, as well as using formats like lists, tables, or graphs to organize data. Collaboration among team members is encouraged to enhance efficiency and accuracy in data recording.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of laboratory procedures and protocols
  • Familiarity with data recording techniques in experimental settings
  • Knowledge of professional presentation standards in scientific documentation
  • Ability to work collaboratively in a team environment
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective data recording methods in laboratory settings
  • Learn about best practices for maintaining laboratory log books
  • Explore techniques for presenting data clearly and professionally
  • Investigate collaborative strategies for conducting experiments in teams
USEFUL FOR

Students in experimental physics courses, laboratory technicians, and educators looking to improve their understanding of laboratory documentation practices.

arianabedi
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Firstly, please excuse me if this post is in the wrong section, I couldn't find any "experimental" physics section. Please note that the template is not used since the questions is pretty much descriptive.

As part my course, I have one lab session per week. Its duration is one and half our and the experiments are usually done in teams of 3.

We are all required to write log books which will be attested one in the next lab session (one week time). However we are marked on how neat the log book is also on "professional presentation".

Now I'm confused; after some research I've found out that a log book should be everything that you do. However during an experiment done in limited time, there is no time to be neat and its impossible to show professionalism with excel graphs and 3D models of equipment; main reason being that computers cannot be used in the lab environment.

Therefore my question is that should a log book be written at the same time the experiment is in process or should the data be recorded otherwise (say voice recording) and then entered to the log book in the same way that a lab report is written?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Log book should be written as you go.

You can finesse the neatness by anticipating some of the things you will need to record.
Your format will be either a list, a table, or a graph, depending on what you have to write. They are trying to force you into good habits.

"professionalism" will be about not using whiteout, noting mistakes and correcting them, that sort of thing - rather than computer printouts. Tidyness is all about legibility - don't scribble. Sometimes you will have a hardcopy to paste in. When you are taking data for a graph, you should be plotting it as you go - especially if you need to locate turning points or intercepts - then you'll know when you need more fine-grained readings.

When there's three of you - one can be the data-taker (take turns) and the other two copy. (If you do this - indicate it in your log: goes to professionalism.) Similarly if you divide a multi-part experiment between you to do it faster.

You'll get the hang of it.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Log book should be written as you go.

You can finesse the neatness by anticipating some of the things you will need to record.
Your format will be either a list, a table, or a graph, depending on what you have to write. They are trying to force you into good habits.

"professionalism" will be about not using whiteout, noting mistakes and correcting them, that sort of thing - rather than computer printouts. Tidyness is all about legibility - don't scribble. Sometimes you will have a hardcopy to paste in. When you are taking data for a graph, you should be plotting it as you go - especially if you need to locate turning points or intercepts - then you'll know when you need more fine-grained readings.

When there's three of you - one can be the data-taker (take turns) and the other two copy. (If you do this - indicate it in your log: goes to professionalism.) Similarly if you divide a multi-part experiment between you to do it faster.

You'll get the hang of it.

Dear Simon,

Thank you for the reply, i'll make sure I attempt to undertake some of your tips tomorrow in my lab session.

-Arian
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K