When should I use a plus or minus sign in space and time translations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of plus and minus signs in space and time translation operators in quantum mechanics, specifically in the equations $$U(t)=e^{\pm iHt/\hbar}$$ and $$T(x)=e^{\pm ixp/\hbar}$$. The reference text, "Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development" by Ballentine, indicates that the positive sign is generally used for these operators, particularly in Chapter 3, page 66. The confusion arises from whether the translation refers to the observing apparatus or the observed entity, affecting the sign used in measurements. The discussion also highlights the relevance of Wigner's Theorem in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with operator notation in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of the significance of Wigner's Theorem
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical derivations involving wave functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave functions, particularly $$\Psi(x+\Delta x)$$ and its implications
  • Review the sign conventions in quantum mechanics textbooks
  • Examine Wigner's Theorem and its applications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the differences between translations of the observing apparatus versus the observed entity
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with wave functions, and anyone seeking clarity on the conventions of space and time translations in quantum theory.

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am a bit confused about the sign in space and time translation operators acting on a state. I found it with both plus and minus sign and I am not sure which one to use when. The equations I am talking about are: $$U(t)=e^{\pm iHt/\hbar}$$ and $$T(x)=e^{\pm ixp/\hbar}$$. Is it a plus or a minus in the exponent? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to vary a bit, but my reference, Ballentine has it as positive in accordance with what I say below.

For the detail on this and other associated matters see Chapter 3 - Ballentine - Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development. In particular see page 66 - equation 3.4 where you see in general its positive for any such operator - time translation, space translation, rotational translation or whatever. Sometimes however the following can confuse the issue. When you speak of a translation do you move the observing apparatus or what is being observed? As an example for a position measurement if you move the measuring equipment a distance d you subtract d from everything measured. Move the thing being measured and you add d - it can be confusing.

The above does not prove the important Wigner's Theorem which is associated with it as well:
https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.0779

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Charles Link
It might help to start with a simple derivation on the wave function ##\Psi(x) ##: ## \\ ## ## \Psi(x+\Delta x)=\Psi(x)+(\frac{\partial{\Psi}}{\partial{x}}) \Delta x=\Psi(x)+\frac{i}{\hbar} \hat{p} \Psi \, \Delta x ##. ## \\ ## This operator equation can be integrated to get ## \Psi(x+x_o)=e^{+\frac{i}{\hbar} x_o \hat{p} } \Psi(x) ##. ## \\ ## If you are trying to find ## \Psi(x-x_o) ##, you reverse the signs. ## \\ ## These formulas can get complicated depending on whether the wave function is being translated or the axes. As @bhobba has mentioned, the textbooks will use different sign conventions at times.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K