brainstorm
- 568
- 0
DaveC426913 said:Well, it worked for Clinton. The public basically told the media "Look, he's doing a good job. Frankly we don't care what his sexual peccadillos are. So shut the h*ll up for once."
[EDIT] this whole celeb sexual misconduct thing is OT, but it's your call brainstorm...
I only used it as an example because it illustrates typical attitudes that many people can identify with or at least recognize.
I don't know if this is even more off topic, but I wonder if the response to the negative press against Clinton didn't have more to do with the fact that the internet was a fresher medium at that time, and many people were still titillated with sexual curiosity at a new medium with less censorship and point-to-point connectivity where sexuality was concerned. By the time of the T Woods scandal, internet had/has become a tiresome oversexed medium where people get shocked or disappointed much more than titillated or gratified as they once may have. Just a hunch.
This may actually related to the thread topic because it has to do with sexual secrecy as having a titillating/seductive effect. As long as your partner is subtly suggesting that they are a wild animal inside sexually, your imagination can run wild with it. Once they fully disclose that their sexual desires and activity really are uncontrollable and they may have trouble being faithful for the rest of their lives, the allure must fade some (depending on the person of course). Again, just a hunch.