benrocks1
- 9
- 0
Can someone explain to me when you use 1/2mv^2-mgh as opposed to 1/2mv^2 or mgh
The discussion revolves around the appropriate use of kinetic energy and potential energy formulas, specifically when to apply the equations 1/2mv^2, mgh, and 1/2mv^2 - mgh. Participants explore contexts in which these equations are relevant, including conservation of energy principles and specific problem scenarios.
Participants generally agree on the definitions of kinetic and potential energy, but there is no consensus on the application of the equations in various contexts. Multiple competing views remain regarding the correct formulation and interpretation of energy conservation principles.
Some participants note potential confusion arising from sign errors in the equations and the need for clarity on specific problem contexts to apply the energy formulas correctly. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the conditions under which each equation is valid.
This discussion may be useful for students and individuals interested in understanding the principles of kinetic and potential energy, particularly in the context of physics problems involving energy conservation and transformations.
benrocks1 said:I know that 1/2mv^2 is Kinetic energy and mgh is potential energy. My question is in some example problems they use 1/2mv^2 and in others they use 1/2mv^2-mgh.
benrocks1 said:While the kinetic energy increases, the potential energy will decrease. Is that correct?
the_emi_guy said:Good, yes that is correct.
Conservation of energy means that the *total* energy remains the same (this is what conservation laws are, some quantity remains unchanged even though its constituent parts are changing).
So if the kinetic energy increase by some amount (say x), now much will the potential energy have to decrease?
What will happen to the quantity 1/2mv^2 - mgh is this case?
benrocks1 said:So 1/2mv^2-mgh would also increase by x?
benrocks1 said:the potential energy will decrease by x. does that mean that 1/2mv^2-mgh also decreases by x?
benrocks1 said:would 1/2mv^2-mgh remain the same?
benrocks1 said:I understand that mgh would = 0 when it hits the ground, but why is it 0 before the drop?
benrocks1 said:Oh so the kinetic energy is 0 because it is not in motion?
benrocks1 said:While the kinetic energy increases, the potential energy will decrease. Is that correct?