When to Use Kinetic vs. Potential Energy: Explained

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the appropriate use of kinetic energy and potential energy formulas, specifically when to apply the equations 1/2mv^2, mgh, and 1/2mv^2 - mgh. Participants explore contexts in which these equations are relevant, including conservation of energy principles and specific problem scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that 1/2mv^2 represents kinetic energy and mgh represents potential energy.
  • There is a question about when to use the total energy equation 1/2mv^2 - mgh versus using just kinetic or potential energy equations.
  • One participant suggests that in some problems, the total energy of a system is the sum of kinetic and potential energy, leading to confusion about the signs in the equations.
  • Another participant proposes that when kinetic energy increases, potential energy decreases, but questions arise about how this affects the total energy expression.
  • There is a discussion about whether the expression 1/2mv^2 - mgh remains constant during energy transformations, with references to specific scenarios like a falling ball or a pendulum swing.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the implications of energy conservation and the correct formulation of the energy equations, leading to corrections and clarifications regarding signs in the equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of kinetic and potential energy, but there is no consensus on the application of the equations in various contexts. Multiple competing views remain regarding the correct formulation and interpretation of energy conservation principles.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential confusion arising from sign errors in the equations and the need for clarity on specific problem contexts to apply the energy formulas correctly. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the conditions under which each equation is valid.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and individuals interested in understanding the principles of kinetic and potential energy, particularly in the context of physics problems involving energy conservation and transformations.

benrocks1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain to me when you use 1/2mv^2-mgh as opposed to 1/2mv^2 or mgh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In what context?
 
So we can know were you are coming from, are you able to answer the following -

What is 1/2mv^2 ?

What is mgh ?
 
I know that 1/2mv^2 is Kinetic energy and mgh is potential energy. My question is in some example problems they use 1/2mv^2 and in others they use 1/2mv^2-mgh.
 
You will have to tell us what problems.

In some case the total energy of a system is KE + PE. It's possible that the direction of "h" in your question has been defined such that PE = mg(-h) making your equation really...

1/2mv^2 + mg(-h)

or it might be nothing of the sort. Tell us about the problem where you saw this equation.
 
benrocks1 said:
I know that 1/2mv^2 is Kinetic energy and mgh is potential energy. My question is in some example problems they use 1/2mv^2 and in others they use 1/2mv^2-mgh.

Good,
So if a problem asks for the kinetic energy of an object, which formula would I use?

If a problem asks for the potential energy of an object, which formula would I use?

Do you know about the concept of conservation of energy? When a ball is falling what is happening to its kinetic energy? Its potential energy?

See if you can figure out from these clues where 1/2mv^2 - mgh would be useful.

EDIT to fix sign: should be 1/2mv^2 + mgh
 
Last edited:
While the kinetic energy increases, the potential energy will decrease. Is that correct? I've thought about it, but i still do not understand why I would use 1/2mv^2-mgh
 
benrocks1 said:
While the kinetic energy increases, the potential energy will decrease. Is that correct?

Good, yes that is correct.

Conservation of energy means that the *total* energy remains the same (this is what conservation laws are, some quantity remains unchanged even though its constituent parts are changing).

So if the kinetic energy increase by some amount (say x), now much will the potential energy have to decrease?

What will happen to the quantity 1/2mv^2 - mgh is this case?

EDIT: should be 1/2mv^2 + mgh
 
Last edited:
the_emi_guy said:
Good, yes that is correct.

Conservation of energy means that the *total* energy remains the same (this is what conservation laws are, some quantity remains unchanged even though its constituent parts are changing).

So if the kinetic energy increase by some amount (say x), now much will the potential energy have to decrease?

What will happen to the quantity 1/2mv^2 - mgh is this case?

So 1/2mv^2-mgh would also increase by x?
 
  • #10
benrocks1 said:
So 1/2mv^2-mgh would also increase by x?

No, think about it carefully (don't get frustrated, you are very warm).

Start by answering: If the kinetic energy increase by some amount (say x), now much will the potential energy have to decrease?
 
  • #11
the potential energy will decrease by x. does that mean that 1/2mv^2-mgh also decreases by x?
 
  • #12
benrocks1 said:
the potential energy will decrease by x. does that mean that 1/2mv^2-mgh also decreases by x?

No,

Here is what you have so far:

Kinetic energy is 1/2mv^2

Potential energy is mgh

Kinetic energy increases by x

Potential energy decreases by x

What happens to 1/2mv^2 - mgh?

EDIT: should be 1/2mv^2 + mgh
 
Last edited:
  • #13
would 1/2mv^2-mgh remain the same?
 
  • #14
benrocks1 said:
would 1/2mv^2-mgh remain the same?

Bingo!

1/2mv^2 - mgh is the total energy and it is conserved. In other words when a ball is falling, the quantity (1/2mv^2 - mgh) will remain constant no matter where that ball is in its flight.

(of course we are ignoring air resistance and other complicating stuff).

*So*, consider this problem, I a drop a ball from 10meters and want to know how fast it was going when it hit the ground.

Calculate (1/2mv^2 - mgh) before the drop (1/2mv^2 = 0).

Calculate (1/2mv^2 - mgh) at the ground (mgh = 0)

And trust that the difference will not change.
 
  • #15
I understand that mgh would = 0 when it hits the ground, but why is it 0 before the drop?
 
  • #16
benrocks1 said:
I understand that mgh would = 0 when it hits the ground, but why is it 0 before the drop?

Look at my previous post carefully, what did I say was = 0 before the drop?
 
  • #17
Oh so the kinetic energy is 0 because it is not in motion?
 
  • #18
benrocks1 said:
Oh so the kinetic energy is 0 because it is not in motion?

Exactly!

I am just realizing that we have a sign error here, perhaps this was the source of your confusion.

It should be 1/2mv^2 + mgh = constant right? Sorry I did not notice this before.
 
  • #19
thanks so much for your all your help and time!
 
  • #20
benrocks1 said:
While the kinetic energy increases, the potential energy will decrease. Is that correct?

ONLY for certain problems.

Consider a pendulum swinging back and forth with no air resistance or friction.

At the top of the swing:

PE = Maximum = mghmax where h is measured from the bottom of the swing
KE = Zero because it stops momentarily

At the bottom of the swing:

PE = Zero
KE = Maximium (= 0.5mV^2)

At any point in between:

PE + KE = Constant = mghmax
 
  • #21
Went back and corrected sign error in my posts (don't want to confuse anyone coming along later).

Can't believe I can post so many times and not notice this, what I get for being half asleep I guess :zzz:
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K