When to use RREF in finding Eigenvectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter selig5560
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvectors
Click For Summary
Using RREF (Reduced Row Echelon Form) can simplify the process of finding eigenvectors by making it easier to express systems in parametric vector form, particularly when a pivot position is involved. However, it is important to note that RREF does not maintain the same eigenvalues as the original matrix, which can lead to confusion. In some cases, row echelon form may be sufficient for solving eigenvector problems. The choice between RREF and row echelon form often depends on the specific context and the desired clarity in the solution process. Understanding when to apply RREF is crucial for effectively finding eigenvectors.
selig5560
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a quick question, when should one use RREF in finding eigvenvectors? I've read through some books and sometimes they use them and sometimes they do not. I'm sorry for such a potentially stupid question.

Thanks,

Zubin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It could be that having one in the pivot position position makes it easier to write system in parametric vector form. Otherwise row echelon form would suffice.
 
Last edited:
Where did you find that "they sometimes use them"? The row reduced form of a matrix does NOT in general have the same eigenvalues as the original matrix so I do see how row reducing could help.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K