When will bones become fossils?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    fossils
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the process of fossilization, specifically the replacement of skeletal calcium with mineral deposits over time. It highlights that mineral replacement varies significantly based on factors such as rock type and pore water chemistry. Fossils are defined as remnants or traces of organisms preserved in the Earth's crust, and they do not necessarily require mineralization to be classified as fossils. Observations from the North Sea indicate that fossils up to 30-40,000 years old show minimal mineralization, while Eemian remains over 130,000 years old exhibit significant mineralization, complicating radiological dating due to chemical alterations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of diagenesis and fossilization processes
  • Knowledge of mineral replacement and its influencing factors
  • Familiarity with geological time scales, particularly Eemian and Sangamonian periods
  • Basic concepts of radiological dating methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of pore water chemistry in mineralization processes
  • Study the differences between mineralized and non-mineralized fossils
  • Explore techniques for dating fossils beyond radiological methods
  • Investigate the geological characteristics of the North Sea and its fossil findings
USEFUL FOR

Geologists, paleontologists, and anyone interested in the processes of fossilization and the geological history of organisms.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Over how long is skeletal calcium essentially replaced by mineral depositation?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I don't know too much about bones, but with calcium carbonate in sea shells, it can be very variable. Mineral replacement will vary in speed and type with rock type, pore water movement pore water chemistry etc, so its hard to give a definite answer. I'll dig through my notes tomorrow to see if I can come up with any rough figures for you. It should be noted that as long as pore water is present, dissolution, deposition and replacement of minerals won't stop, so diagenesis and fossilisation could be viewed as continuous processes.
 
First of all, fosils are most broadly defined as remnant, impression, or trace of an organism of past geologic ages that has been preserved in the Earth's crust.
Fossil do not need to be mineralized to be fossils. From what I have observed about fossils from the North sea when caught in fish trawlers net, there is little mineralization up to 30-40,000 years. However, Eemian (Sangamonian) remains >130,000 years are heavily mineralized.
The setback here is that those fossils can not be dated radiological because of that chemical alteration. So we assume something to be "Eemian" or "Sangamonian" from other clues. I've seen an "Eemian" vertebra of a Arctic whale that was not mineralized at all, the complete skeleton was found on a hill (!) at one of the October revolution Islands, north of Siberia.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
17K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K