B When Would Planets Go Dark if the Sun Went Out?

AI Thread Summary
If the Sun were to go dark, Earth-based observers would initially see the Sun extinguish at 0:00, followed by a delay in the visibility of sunlight reflected off nearby planets like Mercury and Venus. The time it takes for light to travel from the Sun to each planet and then to Earth means that these planets would continue to reflect sunlight for a few seconds to a couple of minutes after the Sun's disappearance. The outer planets, such as Jupiter and Saturn, would also experience a delay, varying based on their positions in their orbits. Calculating these delays involves determining the distances from the Sun to each planet and then to Earth, divided by the speed of light. Overall, observers would see the Sun go dark first, followed by the planets going dark in succession.
mopc
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
If the Sunlight lets say would go off, exactly how long would astronomers on Earth still see sunlight reflected on the surface of Mercury, Venus, Mars, the asteroids, Jupiter Saturn, etc.?
If the Sunlight lets say would go off, exactly how long would astronomers on Earth still see sunlight reflected on the surface of Mercury, Venus, Mars, the asteroids, Jupiter Saturn, etc.?

I mean Sun goes dark at 0:00 from the point of view of Earth-based observers. At that exact moment, if they looked at Venus and Mercury, would they still see a few minutes of sunlight reflecting off their surfaces? And the outer planets Jupiter Saturn, Neptune, Pluto?
Or would we just see everything going dark at the same time?

Because if we see the Sun going dark at 0:00, tht means it went dark at 23:52'. Then Mercury and Venus must have gone dark a few minutes later, like 23h53 for Mercury and 23h55 for Venus , but thats in imaginary absoute time, we would see Venus going dark depending on how far Venus is from us + light speed, supposing the Solar System is in the arrangement of today, at what times would we see from Earth the surface of each planet going dark?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You seem to understand how to do the calculation, so all you need is the current locations of the planets. This page discusses data sources, including NASA's Horizons database. I think you just want to set Ephemeris Type to Vector Table, Edit the Coordinate Center to be the sun (you can search for @sun - sorry PF user sun, I can't work out how not to ping you while typing that), Edit the date range, then generate the table for each Target Body. Read off the x,y,z values and apply Pythagoras to get distances, then divide by 300,000 km/s to get delays in seconds.

The first link discusses some python libraries that may make that easier if you know some programming.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
mopc said:
I mean Sun goes dark at 0:00 from the point of view of Earth-based observers. At that exact moment, if they looked at Venus and Mercury, would they still see a few minutes of sunlight reflecting off their surfaces? And the outer planets Jupiter Saturn, Neptune, Pluto?
Or would we just see everything going dark at the same time?
We would see the Sun go out first, then the planets would go dark. This is because sunlight from the Sun travels a straight line to us and thus a shorter distance than the sunlight that ends up getting reflected from each planet to us. The time taken would be the sum of the distances from the Sun to a planet and then from the planet to Earth divided by the speed of light. For example, Mercury and Venus would taken anywhere from an extra few seconds to an extra minute or two depending on where they are in their orbits (rough guess, I haven't done the math). The planets outside of Earth's orbit would also show some variability based on our orbital positions.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix, FactChecker and BillTre
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top