Where Can I Find the Missing Arxiv Paper hep-th/9312153?

  • Thread starter Thread starter luxxio
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the difficulty in accessing the arXiv paper hep-th/9312153, with participants seeking alternative ways to obtain the document, including direct communication with the authors and accessing related published papers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports that the PDF of the paper is not available on arXiv and that the LaTeX format does not work, asking for assistance in finding it.
  • Another participant shares their experience of attempting to access the paper, noting that they received an error message indicating that the source is available but cannot be converted to PDF, suggesting emailing the authors for help.
  • A participant provides a detailed excerpt from the text file of the paper, discussing concepts related to quantum deformations and the Poincaré algebra, illustrating the content of the paper.
  • Multiple participants inquire about access to the published version of the paper, providing links to the published article on different platforms, indicating that they may not have access to it themselves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a shared concern about the accessibility of the paper, but there is no consensus on the best method to obtain it or on the availability of the published version.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific error messages and access issues, indicating that the situation may depend on individual access rights or institutional subscriptions.

luxxio
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
but arxiv.org tell me that the pdf (or ps) is not available. the latex format don't work. someone can tell me where i can found it? thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope someone else can help. I would write email to one of the authors.
This is what happened to me when I tried. I went to the abstract and clicked on PDF.
I got an error message which said that they have the source but they cannot convert to PDF and it tells me to write email to the authors.

But the word "source" is a link. So I click on that and I get what looks like a text file for the paper itself. I can read, or almost read, this text file. The abstract and the list of references to other papers come first. Then I scroll down and get to the main body of the paper, which looks like this (this is just a short sample):

==quote==
Recently, many proposals were presented showing how to apply the ideas of
quantum deformations [\rone-\rthree] to the $D=4$ Poincar\'e algebra
[\rfour-\rten] as well as
the $D=4$ Poincar\'e group [\releven-\rsixteen].
The $\kappa$-deformation of the $D=4$ Poincar\'e algebra, first proposed
in [\rfour,\reight], leads to the modification of relativistic symmetries with
the
three-dimensional $E(3)$ subalgebra unchanged. The deformation
parameter $\kappa$ describes the fundamental mass in the theory
and the limit $\kappa\rightarrow \infty$ corresponds to the undeformed case.

As a consequence of the \k deformation the mass shell condition is changed as
follows ( $\vec p\sp2\equiv p_1\sp2+p_2\sp2+p_3\sp2$) [\reight]:

$$p_0\sp2- \vec p\sp2=m\sp2\quad\rightarrow\quad \bigl(2\kappa sinh{p_0\over
2\kappa}\bigr)\sp2-\vec p\sp2=m\sp2.\eqn\eonethree$$
The \k-deformed mass-shell condition leads to the following modification of
the Hamiltonian of free
\k-relativistic particles:
$$H=P_0=\sqrt{\vec P\sp2+M\sp2}\;
\rightarrow\;H_0\sp{\kappa}=P_0=2\kappa\,arcsinh{\sqrt{\vec P\sp2+M\sp2}\over
2\kappa}.\eqn\eonetwo$$

In the \k-deformed Poincar\'e algebra, which we describe in section 2,
the four-momenta commute and
we can introduce the space-time
dependence by
the standard Fourier transforms of the four-momenta functions. In such a way we
can choose
the \k-relativistic classical mechanics
to be formulated in terms of
space coordinates satisfying standard relativistic Poisson brackets:
$$\{x\sp{\mu},p\sp{\nu}\}=i\eta\sp{\mu\nu},\qquad \hbox{diag}\eta=(-1,1,1,1).
\eqn\eonefour$$
The form of the Hamilton equations of motion remains also unchanged \ie\
we have
$$\dot x_i={\partial H\sp{\kappa}\over \partial p_i},\quad
\dot p_i=-{\partial H\sp{\kappa}\over \partial x_i}.\eqn\eonefive$$
In such an approach the only change due to the \k-deformation
is the explicit form of the
Hamiltonian (see \eonetwo\ for the free case).

In section 3 we present the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formalism
for both the massive and massless
free \k-relativistic particles described by the Hamiltonian
$H_0\sp{\kappa}$.
As is known [\rseventeen,\reighteen,\rten], however, the velocity decreases
with the increase
of energy at large
energies ($E\gg \kappa m$) in such a model.

To eliminate the velocity decrease with the increase of energy
we present in section 4 two
possible remedies:
\item{i)} The introduction of space coordinates with nonvanishing Poisson
brackets.
We consider massive spinless systems and we
introduce the three space coordinates $x\sp{i}$ as the
functions of the \k deformed Poincar\'e algebra generators.
The standard choice, with space variables satisfying \eonefour\ (for
$\mu,\nu=1,2,3$) was found by
Bacry [\reighteen, \rten]. Recently Maggiore [\rnineteen]
proposed other functions
of the \k Poincar\'e generators
which even for a spinless system describe space coordinates with
nonvanishing Poisson brackets. It appears that such a proposal fits nicely
into the schemes in which the symplectic tensor determining
the Hamilton equations is not canonical.
...
...
==endquote==
 
You don't have access to the published paper itself?

http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/aphy.1995.1092
or
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WB1-45NHYWT-19&_user=867985&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000046731&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=867985&md5=7e8003b7866f6796dc13809e4c4236d7
 
Last edited by a moderator:
xepma said:
You don't have access to the published paper itself?

http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/aphy.1995.1092
or
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WB1-45NHYWT-19&_user=867985&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000046731&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=867985&md5=7e8003b7866f6796dc13809e4c4236d7

thanx.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K