Where Can I Learn This Notation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics_wiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on understanding specific mathematical notation used in systems theory, particularly in the book by Heij, Ran, and van Schagen. Participants confirm that this notation is foundational and can be learned through introductory texts in Analysis, Topology, or Set Theory. The notation includes concepts such as input-output systems and mappings, which are essential for grasping the material. Overall, the notation is deemed elementary and crucial for further study in mathematical systems theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation in systems theory
  • Basic understanding of input-output systems
  • Knowledge of mappings in mathematics
  • Introductory concepts in Analysis, Topology, or Set Theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Read introductory texts on Analysis to understand foundational notation
  • Explore Topology concepts relevant to mathematical systems
  • Study Set Theory to grasp the underlying principles of mappings
  • Investigate resources on input-output systems in control theory
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying systems theory, as well as educators and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of mathematical notation and its applications in theoretical contexts.

Physics_wiz
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to read a mathematical systems theory book (by Heij, Ran, and van Schagen) and he uses notation that I don't understand. He's not the only one...other books use the same notation too, but I never learned it. For example:

"Definition 1.2.2. An input-output system consists of a set of input trajectories [tex]\{u : T \rightarrow U\}[/tex] and output trajectories [tex]\{y : T \rightarrow Y \}[/tex] related by a mapping F. The system behaviour is given by [tex]\beta = \{(u, y) : T \rightarrow U \times Y ; y = F(u)\}[/tex]."

The parts of the quote in latex is what I don't understand. I can have a general idea what he means, but where do students learn this notation? Is it real analysis? If so, I can just buy a book and read since I've seen notation like this practically everywhere without explanation which leads me to think that it's rather elementary.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Physics_wiz said:
I'm trying to read a mathematical systems theory book (by Heij, Ran, and van Schagen) and he uses notation that I don't understand. He's not the only one...other books use the same notation too, but I never learned it. For example:

"Definition 1.2.2. An input-output system consists of a set of input trajectories [tex]\{u : T \rightarrow U\}[/tex] and output trajectories [tex]\{y : T \rightarrow Y \}[/tex] related by a mapping F. The system behaviour is given by [tex]\beta = \{(u, y) : T \rightarrow U \times Y ; y = F(u)\}[/tex]."

The parts of the quote in latex is what I don't understand. I can have a general idea what he means, but where do students learn this notation? Is it real analysis? If so, I can just buy a book and read since I've seen notation like this practically everywhere without explanation which leads me to think that it's rather elementary.

It's rather an elementary thing, which is a good thing!

I would say just read any decent Analysis, Topology or Set Theory introduction and you'll get it. Only like chapter 1 pretty much.

It might look weird now, but once you get it, you won't want to write any other way. It's the easiest way to write math ideas down.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
842
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K