MHB Where Did I Go Wrong When Simplifying This Exponent Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the simplification of the expression \[ \left[(-4a^{-4}b^{-5})^{-3}\right]^4 \]. The initial mistake was in incorrectly applying the exponent of -3 to the constant -4, leading to an erroneous calculation of the final result. The correct approach involves recognizing that the negative sign must be accounted for, resulting in a negative fraction when simplified. Ultimately, the correct answer is \[ \frac{a^{48}b^{60}}{16777216} \], as confirmed by an online calculator. Understanding the treatment of negative exponents and signs is crucial for accurate simplification.
PistolSlap
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have this problem to simplify with positive exponents:

\[\left[(-4a^{-4}b^{-5})^{-3}\right]^4\]

So, working with the interior brackets, I applied -3 to the equation, which resulted in:

\[-(-64)x^{12}b^{15}\]

**because "-4" was not in brackets, the exponent was applied to the 4 only, independent of the negative sign, which resulted in -(-64), so:

\[\left[ 64x^{12}b^{15}\right]^4\]

which resulted in this insane answer:

\[16777216x^{48}b^{60}\]

However, when I checked it, an online calculator said the answer was:

\[\frac{a^{48}b^{60}}{16777216}\]

which means that when applying exponents to the number I did something wrong, as it should have ended up negative, which would have resulted in it becoming a positive denominator.

What did I do wrong to end up with the wrong sign on that number?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Simplifying Question -- Please Help?

In your first step, you incorrectly applied the exponent of -3 to the constant -4, you applied a positive 3 instead. Your first step should look like:

$\displaystyle \left[\left(-4a^{-4}b^{-5} \right)^{-3} \right]^4=\left[(-4)^{1(-3)}a^{-4(-3)}b^{-5(-3)} \right]^4=\left[(-4)^{-3}a^{12}b^{15} \right]^4=\left[-\frac{a^{12}b^{15}}{4^3} \right]^4$

Now, you can see why the result is as given by the online calculator you used.
 
the various negative signs make this kind of complicated.

the first thing i would do is recognize that:

$-4a^{-4}b^{-5} = (-1)(4)(a^{-4}b^{-5})$

so:

$(-4a^{-4}b^{-5})^{-3} = (-1)^{-3}(4)^{-3}(a^{-4})^{-3}(b^{-5})^{-3}$

and:

$(-1)^{-3} = \dfrac{1}{(-1)^3} = \dfrac{1}{-1} = -1$, so

$(-1)^{-3}(4)^{-3}(a^{-4})^{-3}(b^{-5})^{-3} = -[(4)^{-3}(a^{-4})^{-3}(b^{-5})^{-3}]$

now, "inside the brackets" the first term is:

$4^{-3} = \dfrac{1}{4^3}$, so we have:

$(-4a^{-3}b^{-5})^{-3} = -\left(\dfrac{a^{(-4)(-3)}b^{(-5)(-3)}}{4^3}\right) = -\left(\dfrac{a^{12}b^{15}}{4^3}\right)$

taking the 4th power of this, the negative sign goes away, and we get:

$[(-4a^{-3}b^{-5})^{-3}]^4 = \left[-\left(\dfrac{a^{12}b^{15}}{4^3}\right)\right]^4 = \left(\dfrac{a^{12}b^{15}}{4^3}\right)^4$

$ = \dfrac{a^{48}b^{60}}{4^{12}}$

as a side note, your reasoning that since (-4) was "not in brackets" the exponent did not apply to the negative sign but only to the 4 is wrong...you just got lucky, because -3 is ODD.

for example:

$(-2a)^2 = 4a^2$ but $-(2a)^2 = -4a^2$

since the first is $(-2a)(-2a)$ while the second is $-(2a)(2a)$.
 
Re: Simplifying Question -- Please Help?

Awesome, thanks, I understand now! :D

MarkFL said:
In your first step, you incorrectly applied the exponent of -3 to the constant -4, you applied a positive 3 instead. Your first step should look like:

$\displaystyle \left[\left(-4a^{-4}b^{-5} \right)^{-3} \right]^4=\left[(-4)^{1(-3)}a^{-4(-3)}b^{-5(-3)} \right]^4=\left[(-4)^{-3}a^{12}b^{15} \right]^4=\left[-\frac{a^{12}b^{15}}{4^3} \right]^4$

Now, you can see why the result is as given by the online calculator you used.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top