Where do electromagnetic waves get their energy from?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Electromagnetic waves (EMW) are generated by accelerating charges, which requires more energy than simply accelerating a charge due to the radiation of energy in the form of EM waves. When a dipole antenna is fed, charges oscillate, storing energy in local fields while radiating EM energy, which appears as resistance to the transmitter. The energy not radiated accumulates in reactances, and the efficiency of radiation is maximized when the dipole operates at its natural resonant frequency. Understanding the conversion of kinetic energy (KE) into potential energy (PE) and the behavior of oscillating fields is crucial in analyzing EM wave generation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave generation
  • Familiarity with dipole antennas and their operation
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy and potential energy concepts
  • Basic principles of oscillating electric and magnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Learn about dipole antenna design and resonant frequency matching
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in electromagnetic systems
  • Investigate the effects of oscillating electric fields on charge displacement
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism or antenna theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the energy dynamics of electromagnetic wave generation.

radio171
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We know that EMW are generated by accelerating charges.
If I accelerate a charge it should gain kinetic energy equal to half the mass of the charge times velocity squared.
But at the same time it will radiate electromagnetic waves which carry energy itself.
So where does this energy come from?
It seems that it requires more energy to accelerate the charge and some of this energy is radiated.
If so, how do I know how much of it is turned into EMR and how much is turned into kinetic energy.

Please, correct me, because my logic doesn't make sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. It takes more energy to accelerate a charged object than it would take to accelerate an otherwise identical object.
 
There are many ways in which an EM wave can be generated but consider a simple transmitter feeding a dipole. During each cycle, charges (electrons) are accelerated in either direction and most of the energy is stored in the local fields (as each side of the dipole is charged and discharged). This involves both KE and PE. But, as well as the energy per cycle that is sloshing about in the dipole, there is EM energy radiated in the form of a wave and this actually appears (to the transmitter) as a resistance. The energy that's not radiated builds up in the reactances. When the dipole is fed at it's natural resonant frequency, it is easiest to match to the transmitter / feeder but an antenna of any shape or length can be made to radiate.
radio171 said:
it should gain kinetic energy equal to half the mass of the charge times velocity squared
It's worth remembering that the actual KE involved in the average movement of electrons in time with the EM wave frequency is actually very tiny and the energy associated with the currents (movement of charge) is actually the form of an oscillating magnetic field. As an exercise, calculate the maximum velocity and displacement of an electron with a mean drift speed of a couple of mm per second (at DC) when the field is being alternated at 10MHz and a field of, say 10V/m.
The displacement of charge is associated with the oscillating electric field.
It seems to me that your worry about where the KE goes can be resolved by considering the Potential Energy that it's converted to. It's only the in-phase components of these fields that actually radiates as a wave. Locally, there is a complicated jumble of oscillating fields in a variety of phases and directions and these don't radiate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K