Where does phi go in the probability density for hydrogen?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of the azimuthal angle phi in the probability density of hydrogenic wavefunctions. It is established that phi appears in the wavefunction as part of the term exp(i m phi), where m is the magnetic quantum number. When calculating the probability density, represented as psi*psi, the dependence on phi is eliminated, leading to a probability density that is independent of phi for angular momentum eigenstates. However, for non-eigenstates, phi contributes to oscillatory terms in the probability density, reflecting interference effects between different states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically wavefunctions and probability densities.
  • Familiarity with spherical harmonics and their role in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of quantum numbers, particularly n, l, and m.
  • Basic grasp of complex numbers and their application in wavefunctions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of spherical harmonics in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of Noether's theorem in quantum systems.
  • Investigate the concept of angular momentum eigenstates and their significance.
  • Learn about the mathematical treatment of wavefunction interference in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists studying atomic structure, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of wavefunctions and probability densities in quantum systems.

Signifier
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
The analytical solution for the wavefunction of a hydrogenic electron with quantum numbers n, l and m has a spherical harmonic part that involves theta and phi (in spherical coordinates). I was looking in Griffiths, and the spherical harmonics part only has phi as exp(i m phi) where i is the imaginary unit, m is the magnetic quantum number and phi is phi (sorry I didn't use TeX). Phi doesn't show up in any other way, than attached to an i in an exponential...

So the complex conjugate of the wave function multiplied by the wave function itself should kill all the terms with phi. Am I correct?

How does phi factor into the probability density? Isn't it removed in taking psi*psi? I am trying to sketch the probability densities of hydrogen's first few wavefunctions.

Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed. [tex]\varphi[/tex] only affects phase, and not amplitude, but it is important in other respects. Sometimes it is useful to sketch the phase of the wavefunction using colour.
 
You're right, all eigenstates have the form [itex]\psi = A(r,\theta) e^{i m \phi}[/itex], so that:

[tex]\psi^* \psi = |A(r,\theta)|^2[/tex]

which doesn't depend on [itex]\phi[/itex]. This is good: just as an energy eigenstate has probabilities that don't depend on time, and a momenutm eigenstate (e^ipx) has probabiliites that don't depend on position, an angular momentum eigenstate should have probabilities that don't depend on [itex]\phi[/itex] (this is related to Noether's theorem, a far reaching result connecting conserved quantities like momentum and energy to symmetries like rotation and time translation).

On the other hand, if we have a state that is not an angular momentum eigenstate, such as:

[tex]\psi= A(r,\theta) e^{im\phi} + B(r,\theta) e^{in\phi}[/tex]

we get:

[tex]\psi^* \psi = |A(r,\theta)|^2 + |B(r,\theta)|^2 + 2Re \{ A B^* e^{i(m-n)\phi}\}[/tex]

or, assuming A and B are real:

[tex]\psi^* \psi = A(r,\theta)^2 + B(r,\theta)^2 + 2AB\cos((m-n)\phi)[/tex]

which should reming you of the oscillation between two energy eigenstates.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K