Where Does the Double Hat in the Hamiltonian Raising Operator Come From?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
Chronos000
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm given the line: (the coding stopped responding for the "hats")

[tex]\hat{}H[/tex]([tex]\hat{}a[/tex]|n>) = (doublehat a) H(hat) |n> + [Hhat,ahat]|n>

I'm assuming Hhat= hbar *w ( aa* + 1/2)

so I don't know what they are doing. where does the double hat come from. where does any of it come from basically?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The hat just comes to differentiate between a hermitian operator and its eigenvalue.
I am not sure myself what the the doublhat means in your case.

Anyway this equation is from the commutator relation:
[tex][H,a]= Ha - aH[/tex]
 
but this expression includes the commutation [H,a].