Where Does the Energy That Produces Gravity Come From?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vago Vent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of gravity, specifically questioning the source of energy associated with gravitational forces. Participants explore concepts related to energy, force, and gravitational interactions, using hypothetical scenarios involving the Earth and Moon to illustrate their points. The conversation touches on theoretical implications and philosophical considerations regarding energy conservation and the nature of forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that gravity is a force, not energy, and questions where the energy that produces gravity originates.
  • Another participant suggests that energy is involved only when gravity acts over a distance, using examples of objects at rest versus falling objects to illustrate their point.
  • A participant challenges the idea of a 'perfect' orbit, arguing that energy from tides is derived from the orbits of the Earth and Moon, which are not static.
  • One participant argues that a force does not require energy to exist, using the analogy of a compressed spring to support their claim.
  • Another participant emphasizes that gravitational force is associated with potential energy, stating that gravitational fields possess energy and that force is a means of energy transfer.
  • One participant claims that the energy producing gravity comes from the potential energy of massive objects, linking this to Newton's theories and suggesting further reading for clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between gravity, force, and energy. There is no consensus on the source of energy related to gravity, and multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the conservation of angular momentum and the dynamics of the Earth-Moon system, indicating that assumptions about static orbits may not hold. The discussion also highlights the complexity of gravitational fields and their associated energies, which are not fully resolved.

Vago Vent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been pondering on this for a while.

Gravity is a force, not energy. But where is the energy that produce gravity?

For an example.

If there only Earth and Moon existed and nothing else exists. (People and water are located underground inside the Earth or whatever the case that may be.) If the moon kept in perfect orbit where it does not move away or closer and creates the tides for water underground. People could produce energy from the tide, so where all the energy coming from? If gravity is not a form of energy, then what is the energy that produce gravity?

Does this break the "Law of Nature" philosophy in term of energy being not created?

Please and thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this context think of energy as a force over a distance. The force of gravity only involves energy if it acts on an object over a distance. Book on a table -> its not traveling a distance so there is no energy involved. Book falling through the air -> The force of gravity is acting over a distance so the book is gaining energy.

As for your example, you shouldn't expect a 'perfect' orbit to produce energy from tides! The energy from tides comes from the energy of the Earth and moon's orbits. The distance between the earth/moon as well as the speeds of the Earth and moon are changing (slightly) as a result of us harnessing tides.
 
Can you explains more on that?

For gravity, when there is force, there have to be energy. Am I wrong?
 
A force does not require energy. Consider a spring that you can compress. The act of compressing it does require energy. Keeping it compressed with a force does not require energy. You can latch it in a compressed state and toss it into space, it will stay latched and compressed and no energy need be consumed.
 
Vago Vent said:
I have been pondering on this for a while.

Gravity is a force, not energy. But where is the energy that produce gravity?

For an example.

If there only Earth and Moon existed and nothing else exists. (People and water are located underground inside the Earth or whatever the case that may be.) If the moon kept in perfect orbit where it does not move away or closer and creates the tides for water underground. People could produce energy from the tide, so where all the energy coming from? If gravity is not a form of energy, then what is the energy that produce gravity?

Does this break the "Law of Nature" philosophy in term of energy being not created?

Please and thank you for your time.

what you're describing is impossible. it's impossible for the moon to maintain its current distance from the earth, especially with all the energy the moon is using up by creating the tidal forces!
so where does all this energy from the moon exerting its forces on the Earth go? according to the conservation of angular momentum law, the moon is constantly moving closer to the Earth as it revolves around the earth.
again, it's not possible for the moon to maintain its current distance from the earth.
 
Glen Bartusch said:
according to the conservation of angular momentum law, the moon is constantly moving closer to the Earth as it revolves around the earth.
again, it's not possible for the moon to maintain its current distance from the earth.
It moves further. Check your work.
For gravity, when there is force, there have to be energy. Am I wrong?
There is usually an associated potential, so an object in gravitational field has potential energy.

Field itself also has energy. Gravitational field is not an exception, but this is getting into something a bit more complex.

Don't think of force as manifestation of energy, but rather as means of transfer of energy. If force is applied over distance, work is done, and energy is transferred from one body to another.
 
the energy that produces gravity is from the potential energy the planet Earth has, this energy is by nature come with all heavy mass objects, one evidence for that, that the gravity and the mass of the planet are direct proportional to each other, and otherwise you may think, this coincides with Newton's theories.
i recommend you to see chapter 13 of the serway/jewett physics book, google it, the chapter's title is "universal gravitation", you may find what you are looking for in it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
7K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K