High School How Can We Prove That x^x Reaches a Minimum at x = e^-1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function x^x reaches its minimum at x = e^-1, which can be proven through calculus techniques involving differentiation. The minimum of the function y = (x^x) occurs at y = 1/e, leading to the transcendental equation x ln x = -1. Additionally, patterns emerge where (x^x)^x has a minimum at x = e^-(1/2) and ((x^x)^x)^x at x = e^-(1/3). These findings suggest a consistent behavior in the minima of exponential functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation techniques.
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of transcendental equations and their numerical solutions.
  • Basic skills in using graphing calculators or software for visualization.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differentiation of exponential functions, particularly x^x.
  • Learn about transcendental equations and methods for solving them numerically.
  • Explore the properties of local extrema in calculus.
  • Investigate the behavior of nested exponential functions like (x^x)^x.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians interested in optimization problems, and educators seeking examples of exponential function behavior.

cmb
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
128
I've noticed that x^x is a minimum for x = e^-1

I put it as a high school problem because I presume it's one of those simple differential proofs/identities, but I can't really see how to get to e^-1. Too long since I did any calculus. Can someone please show me how to arrive at that?

How about (x^x)^x is a minimum for x = e^-(1/2)?

and ((x^x)^x)^x is a minimum for x = e^-(1/3)

I presume the pattern goes on.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cmb said:
I've noticed that x^x is a minimum for x = e^-1

I put it as a high school problem because I presume it's one of those simple differential proofs/identities, but I can't really see how to get to e^-1. Too long since I did any calculus. Can someone please show me how to arrive at that?

How about (x^x)^x is a minimum for x = e^-(1/2)?

and ((x^x)^x)^x is a minimum for x = e^-(1/3)

I presume the pattern goes on.
How did you find those minima? And what do you remember about the properties of local extrema?
 
If you're asking me to differentiate and find the turning point, sure, I just don't know how to do that.

I did this with a calculator.

In the meantime, it is curious that;-

(x^x) is NOT a minimum for the lowest possible x
BUT
if y=(x^x) then; (y^y) IS a minimum for the lowest possible y

(i.e. (x^x)^(x^x) IS a minimum for the lowest possible (x^x) but NOT the lowest possible x)

Can calculus show that too? I'm just no good at calculus.
 
cmb said:
If you're asking me to differentiate and find the turning point, sure, I just don't know how to do that.

I did this with a calculator.

In the meantime, it is curious that;-

(x^x) is NOT a minimum for the lowest possible x
BUT
if y=(x^x) then; (y^y) IS a minimum for the lowest possible y

(i.e. (x^x)^(x^x) IS a minimum for the lowest possible (x^x) but NOT the lowest possible x)

Can calculus show that too? I'm just no good at calculus.

You can find the method for differentiating ##x^x## on line. There are several videos showing how it's done.

The minimum is when ##x = 1/e##.

If ##y = x^x## then the minimum of ##y^y## is when ##y = 1/e##, hence ##x^x = 1/e##.

This can be simplified to ##x \ln x = -1##, which is a transcendental equation and can ot be solved numerically.
 
cmb said:
I've noticed that x^x is a minimum for x = e^-1

I put it as a high school problem because I presume it's one of those simple differential proofs/identities, but I can't really see how to get to e^-1. Too long since I did any calculus. Can someone please show me how to arrive at that?

How about (x^x)^x is a minimum for x = e^-(1/2)?

and ((x^x)^x)^x is a minimum for x = e^-(1/3)

I presume the pattern goes on.

Yes, this is not too hard to prove using the same technique as minimizing ##x^x##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K