Which course would be more useful for theoretical physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xGAME-OVERx
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the choice between two courses—Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems—considering their relevance and utility for a student aiming to pursue theoretical physics, particularly in areas like particle physics, field theory, and general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the Differential Equations course is foundational and will be frequently applicable in various areas of physics, including quantum mechanics and electromagnetism.
  • Others express that while the Dynamical Systems course is interesting and has physical applications, it may not be as essential without a solid background in Differential Equations.
  • A participant notes that understanding differential equations is crucial before tackling dynamical systems, as the latter heavily relies on the former.
  • One participant mentions that they have learned similar topics in their own Differential Equations course but did not find them directly applicable in their physics studies.
  • Another participant suggests auditing the Dynamical Systems course for additional insight, despite recommending Differential Equations as the primary choice.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally lean towards recommending the Differential Equations course as more beneficial for theoretical physics, but there is recognition of the value and interest in the Dynamical Systems course. No consensus is reached on which course is definitively better, as opinions vary based on personal experiences and perceived relevance.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight that the choice may depend on the student's prior exposure to differential equations and the specific curriculum structure at their university, which limits credit hours.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a focus on theoretical physics, particularly those evaluating course selections in mathematics and their applicability to physics topics.

xGAME-OVERx
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I have the opportunity to take two different courses this year (alas the limit on 120 credits per year means I can't take both), and I seek advice on which one would be more appropriate considering I wish to move into theoretical physics (like particle physics, field theory, general relativity) after my current natural sciences degree:

First Option:
"Differential Equations

Fourier series. Partial differential equations (PDEs): diffusion equation, wave equation, Laplace's equation. Solution by separation of variables in Cartesian and polar co-ordinates. Ordinary differential equations (ODEs): solution by reduction of order and variation of parameters. Series solution and the method of Forbenius. Legendre's and Bessel's equations: Legendre polynomials, Bessel functions and their recurrence relations."

Second Option:
"Dynamical Systems:

Qualitative behaviour of discrete and continuous systems. General first order systems in two variables. Classification of equilibrium points. Periodic orbits and limit cycles. Bifurcation theory. Saddle- node, transcritical, pitchfork and Hopf bifurcations. Stability of limit cycles. The Logistic map, period-doubling, transition to chaos. Henon map, Lorenz system, Rossler system."

To me, the first seems like it might be more useful, considering the introduction to DEs in the calculus module was very light, but the second seems like it might be more interesting and have more immediate physical applications (that's not to say the first won't be interesting!).

Also, I have covered everything up to separation of variables in cartesian coordinates in other parts of the degree, but I've covered nothing in the dynamical systems module.

Options please!
Thanks in Advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xGAME-OVERx said:
Fourier series [quantum field theory]
Partial differential equations (PDEs): wave equation [qft], Laplace's equation [Maxwell electromagnetism].
Solution by separation of variables in Cartesian and polar co-ordinates [quantum mechanics / Schrödinger equation (!)].
Legendre's and Bessel's equations: Legendre polynomials, Bessel functions and their recurrence relations. [qm problems with spherical symmetry]

I'm not sure about the second one, I learned most of those in my (math department) DE course, but I never really used them in physics. The subjects that I quoted from your post, however, are extremely useful in theoretical physics. For each I listed at least one area of physics for which I have actually used this method during my Master's in theoretical physics.

Therefore, though I am not really familiar with either course, I am strongly inclined to recommend the former to you.
 
Definitely the first one. All the things you mentioned will come up over and over again in physics. Dynamical systems is a super interesting course (and I'd encourage you to audit it if your university allows it), but DEs will be much more useful.
 
Judging by what you wrote, it looks like the differential equations course something of a "first course" in differential equations; meaning that you have not had a previous course on differential equations. If this is true, then I would recommend taking this course first. The reason being that dynamical systems are 95-99% all differential equations. Meaning that you should already have experience with differential equations before tackling dynamical systems.
 
Thanks guys! I suspected as much but it's nice to get opinions from more experienced people.

@CompuChip: The list of applications is especially interesting. It would appear I've managed to do 20 credits of QM without adequate background!

@nicksauce: UK universities seem to be very inflexible about the number of credits a student can take. However, I can attend the lectures unofficially :)

@cmos Yes, as I said, we covered a small amount of DEs in first year calculus, but very little since. It's interesting you say that, because the Dynamical systems course has a very small amount of DE related pre-requisites. A quirk of the modular system I suppose...

Thanks Again!
Scott
 
xGAME-OVERx said:
@CompuChip: The list of applications is especially interesting. It would appear I've managed to do 20 credits of QM without adequate background!

Hehe, apparently.
I'm sure that if you open the index of any (good) QM book, you will definitely find "separation of variables", "wave equation" and "Legendre polynomial" there :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K