Which engineering uses the most physics on the job?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between different engineering disciplines and the application of physics in their respective careers. Participants explore how job roles and career trajectories influence the use of physics and mathematics in engineering, particularly in mechanical and electrical engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the lack of mathematical application in entry-level mechanical engineering jobs and seeks clarity on how to engage more with applied physics problems.
  • Another participant suggests that the specific branch of engineering may not be as critical as the nature of the job and career progression, indicating that opportunities for applying physics may increase with experience.
  • A participant advocates for electrical engineering, claiming it involves some of the most interesting physics.
  • One contributor emphasizes the importance of proactively identifying and demonstrating the applications of physics and mathematics to employers and clients, suggesting that this approach can enhance the presence of physics in one's work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on which engineering discipline uses the most physics, and multiple perspectives on the relationship between job roles and the application of physics are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that entry-level positions may limit the application of physics, and there are varying opinions on how to navigate career paths to engage more with physics and mathematics.

zachdr1
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
I always hear that mechanical engineers (at least ones without a ton of experience) rarely ever do any math. I really enjoy studying mechanical engineering right now, and I really want to make sure that the stuff I'm studying is what I'll be using on the job.

How does a mechanical engineer (or any engineer) avoid doing work on CATIA all day, and instead do actual calculations and applied physics problems, and which engineering leans more towards the "solving applied physics problems" side?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know that it's so much a matter of selecting an appropriate "branch" of engineering as it is the actual job that you end up doing, and then the trajectory of your career. In a lot of entry level jobs the company likely won't want to have new hires working on complex problems. But as you progress the opportunities will be there, particularly if you seek them out. In my experience, people tend to gravitate towards the kinds of work that they enjoy doing in the long term. When they feel "stuck" it's often temporary.
 
I think Electrical Engineering has some of the most interesting physics in it. That's why I chose it as my engineering field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delong
Most of my career, I've viewed it as my job to recognize the applications of physics and math to the interests of my employers and clients. Often, they do not fully recognize the full range of how physics can be applied to help their bottom line or address their interests.

If you wait for employers and clients to realize how you can help them, there will be much less physics in your life.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K