Which Equation Deserves the Title of the World's Most Beautiful?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Or Entity?
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of which equation deserves the title of the world's most beautiful, with participants contributing equations from both mathematics and physics. The scope includes personal favorites, aesthetic considerations, and the elegance of various equations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose Euler's identity, e^{i\pi}+1=0, as a candidate for its simplicity and beauty.
  • Others suggest E=mc^{2}, noting its mainstream status but also its generality.
  • One participant humorously claims that 1=0 can derive everything.
  • Maxwell's equations are mentioned for their foundational role in electromagnetism.
  • Another participant cites the de Broglie wavelength equation, p = \frac{h}{\lambda}, as beautiful.
  • There are discussions about the approximation nature of E=mc^{2}, with some arguing it is only a first term in a power series.
  • Participants mention the Riemann zeta function and its connection to the Riemann hypothesis as a significant mathematical equation.
  • Some express appreciation for the Fourier transform equation, f(\omega)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(t) e^{i \omega t} dt, for its beauty.
  • Others highlight the continuity equation in physics for its relation to conservation laws.
  • Several playful or humorous contributions include unconventional equations like 2+2=5 and pi=3.0.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of opinions on what constitutes beauty in equations, with no consensus on a single "most beautiful" equation. Multiple competing views and equations are presented, reflecting personal preferences and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the nature of equations, such as approximations or derivations, depend on specific contexts or interpretations that are not universally agreed upon. The discussion includes both serious and humorous contributions, highlighting the subjective nature of beauty in mathematics and physics.

  • #31
DR13 said:
2+2=5

That is only true for large values of 2.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
pi=3.0
 
  • #33
For me the Fourier transform equation is the most beautiful
<br /> <br /> F(\omega)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(t) e^{i \omega t} dt
 
  • #34
Chi Meson said:
That is only true for large values of 2.

As long as the error bars are sufficiently broad it could work as well.
 
  • #35
I like:

x2+y2=1
y = xx
 
  • #36
Upisoft said:
pi=3.0

:-p
 
  • #37
178212+184112=192212
:approve:
 
  • #38
Upisoft said:
pi=3.0

Upisoft hits R for 9000 damage (.14159 Overkill)
R dies
 
  • #39
Dembadon said:
Upisoft hits R for 9000 damage (.14159 Overkill)
R dies

not over 9K, notice
 
  • #40
Dembadon said:
Upisoft hits R for 9000 damage (.14159 Overkill)
R dies

They will fix it in the next version...:smile:
 
  • #41
the very simple (and suppressed!) standard model lagrangian
 

Attachments

  • standardmodel.JPG
    standardmodel.JPG
    74 KB · Views: 506
  • #42
f(x)=\frac{a_0}{2} + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, [a_n \cos(nx) + b_n \sin(nx)]

I'm surprised no one has put this one up yet!
 
  • #43
fccd2367982ea085e0d801aa2cfbc5e1.png


my identity

a single equation? i don't know too many to think of
 
Last edited:
  • #44
The most beautiful "equation" is

\langle a,b~\vert~o(a)=2, o(b)=3, o(ab)=29, o((ab)^4(abb)^2)=50, o(a((ab)^4(abb)^2)^{25})=5, o(ab^{abababababb})=34\rangle

Extra points for anybody who says what I've written down here :biggrin:
 
  • #45
Ohm's law gets my vote.
 
  • #46
G_{\mu \nu} = 8T_{\mu \nu}

Where I have set c = G = \pi = 1
 
  • #47
vanesch said:
I'd say: 1 = 0. From this one, you can derive everything :biggrin:
:smile:


What about i>u ?
:-p :-p :-p
 
  • #48
I find derivatives beautiful even though I also hate them.
 
  • #49
Math:

Euler's Equation
e^{\pm i \theta} = \cos(\theta) + i \sin(\theta)

because it demonstrates the meaning of i as a transform/operator, rather than sqrt(-1)

Physics:

Continuity Equation (for conserved \phi):
\frac{\delta \phi}{\delta t} + \nabla \cdot f = 0

because it relates the physical meaning of the partial derivative to that of the total derivative.

Biology:

\Delta G = -n F \Delta E

Energy for work is the number of moles of stored energy from electric charge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K