- #71
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 10,123
- 137
Well, since I'm in no Danger of winning any prize other than PF's own Darwin Award (Finch Award??), I am rather relaxed about it..
But Danger is in Danger because of you! :tongue2:arildno said:Well, since I'm in no Danger of winning any prize other than PF's own Darwin Award (Finch Award??), I am rather relaxed about it..
Not seriously. It was only in GD and all done in fun. But you can't expect people nominated for the funniest member to just sit around and watch quietly, do you? Though I'm quite miffed that the winner just took his ribbon and then stopped being funny. :grumpy: It'll be a tough race this year between you, Artman and Danger, I'm just not sure who I would vote for if you're all nominated. It might be like the Grammy Awards, where you really end up voting for the person you would have voted for last year if there wasn't so much other good competition, and then next year you vote for the person who you would have voted for this year if there wasn't that person from last year still deserving...:tongue2: And then there's the consideration of who I'd most like to see thrown into the volcano...it's really a tough call.zoobyshoe said:People campaign?!
Whew, I'm glad you agree - that award presentation might have been awkward.loseyourname said:Can we have the antithesis of that category? I think I should win the award for member whose post quality has most degraded over the last year.
All great suggestions. I hate to tell you this, but I'll bet you will be a nominee for funniest member. It will be a bloody battle for funniest member this year.Moonbear said:Not seriously. It was only in GD and all done in fun. But you can't expect people nominated for the funniest member to just sit around and watch quietly, do you? Though I'm quite miffed that the winner just took his ribbon and then stopped being funny. :grumpy: It'll be a tough race this year between you, Artman and Danger, I'm just not sure who I would vote for if you're all nominated. It might be like the Grammy Awards, where you really end up voting for the person you would have voted for last year if there wasn't so much other good competition, and then next year you vote for the person who you would have voted for this year if there wasn't that person from last year still deserving...:tongue2: And then there's the consideration of who I'd most like to see thrown into the volcano...it's really a tough call.
Oh, here's something worth inquiring about...will last year's winners be eligible in the same category again this year? Or should we be prepared to pass the torch on to someone new? I rather like the idea of not being eligible in two consecutive years (despite all the joking last year of my aspirations to have the longest running guru record at PF). I know there are new people in biology worthy of recognition, and I'm sure that's true in all the other categories too. Plus, that would make it more fun and maybe reduce some of the over-the-top competitiveness if everyone knows it's just one term and then someone else will get their recognition the next year.
I'm pondering. Perhaps a "Funniest Mentor" popular vote is in order. Some names come to mind.Evo said:It will be a bloody battle...
I have a feeling that you're making the list too. muwahahahazoobyshoe said:I'm pondering. Perhaps a "Funniest Mentor" popular vote is in order. Some names come to mind.
I was demonstrating my excellent communication skills by trying to not confuse those who would be put off by 'verb phrase' or 'phrasal verb'. :tongue2:loseyourname said:"Shoo," by itself, is the verb.
I doubted that until arildno said that he and his friends also use it. I wonder if its history is similar to 'boo'. ??I'm having a wonderful time trying to get some idea of this word's origins. Some dictionaries claim that it is simply instinctive
Yes, what color would you like for your ribbon? Gold, pink, and rainbow are already taken.Anyway, can I get the etymology guru award?
ZapperZ is excluded; He already won Biggest Disney Sucker Guru.zoobyshoe said:I'm pondering. Perhaps a "Funniest Mentor" popular vote is in order. Some names come to mind.
And checkin' it twice.Evo said:I have a feeling that you're making the list too. muwahahaha
Fictional categories suggested by way of humorously highlighting a particular person's idiosynchratic interests, even when done by themselves, are not considered exclusionary to the "Funniest Mentor" popular vote. There may, in fact, be no means of weasling out of it.honestrosewater said:ZapperZ is excluded; He already won Biggest Disney Sucker Guru.
honestrosewater said:ZapperZ is excluded; He already won Biggest Disney Sucker Guru.
Sorry, funds for your tiara are being used to incorporate a hand pump into the Funniest Member's beer hemlet, so they won't have to suck anymore. (It was Evo's idea, though I'm sure she won't admit to it now.)ZapperZ said:I won already? Then where the hell is my Mickey Ears tiara??!
Zz.
honestrosewater said:Sorry, funds for your tiara are being used to incorporate a pump into the Funniest Member's beer hemlet, so they won't have to suck anymore. (It was Evo's idea.)
No, I have been practicing my subtlety - my insults are no longer visible to the naked eye.Moonbear said:Are you saying the funniest members suck? :grumpy: :rofl:
Moonbear said:Are you saying the funniest members suck? :grumpy: :rofl:
Funniest not :grumpy: est!arildno said:
Was it that bad?Lisa! said:Funniest not :grumpy: est!
I would respond, but it wouldn't be appropriate outside of GD.arildno said:Was it that bad?
ing is even worse!arildno said:Was it that bad?
Don't say that - you'll just make him cry more!Lisa! said:ing is even worse!
Let's see! I like making men !honestrosewater said:Don't say that - you'll just make him cry more!
honestrosewater said:Obviously you haven't met yourdadonapogostick.
I have to agree that it's a baffling name. The explanation she recently proffered just confused me more.Les Sleeth said:But if there's honest rosewater, it implies there is DIShonest rosewater, which seems to be unfairly smearing rosewater!
But it is a fact that not everything (or everyone) smells as rosewater.Les Sleeth said:Well, my dad used to hop around on a pogo stick, so I can understand that one. But if there's honest rosewater, it implies there is DIShonest rosewater, which seems to be unfairly smearing rosewater!
honestrosewater said:I told this story in Les' etymology thread. Rosewater does not refer to the rosewater made from rose petals. I had some cut roses sitting in water in a vase, as people do. After removing the wilting roses, I noticed they had imparted a very pleasing, unique, complex scent to the water, and I thought it would be a shame to just throw this away. So I tried to find some use for it. But along with the beautiful smell, the roses had left dirt, leaves, and who knows what pesticides and microscopic organisms, making the water unfit for any purpose I could think of; I couldn't figure out how to separate the desirable parts from the undesirable. After a few days, the smell turned sickly and the water clouded; I had to throw most of it out, but I saved part of it in my new pen name: Rosewater.
Later, when I was thinking of changing my legal name, I chose Honest for my first name, Waking for my middle name, and Rosewater was an obvious choice for my last name. I was almost Honest Waking Rosewater. I still might change it some day.
What is confusing?zoobyshoe said:Again: more confused than I was before.
Great now I'm confused. How exactly does that explain it?Les said:This, at least, explains your extraordinary interest in logic. :tongue2:
honestrosewater said:Great now I'm confused. How exactly does that explain it?
My explanation was funny? What do you mean, funny? Let me understand this cause, I don't know maybe it's me, I'm a little ****ed up maybe, but I'm funny how? I mean, funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? I make you laugh... I'm here to ****in' amuse you? What do you mean funny, funny how?Les Sleeth said:Lol. You shouldn't let us all know how easy it is to wind you up. (It's a joke, suggesting your explanation is funny, and you are obsessed with logic because you need it so much.)
honestrosewater said:My explanation was funny? What do you mean, funny? Let me understand this cause, I don't know maybe it's me, I'm a little ****ed up maybe, but I'm funny how? I mean, funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? I make you laugh... I'm here to ****in' amuse you? What do you mean funny, funny how?