Which is Brighter: Gamma Ray Bursters or Quasars?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are the most luminous events in the universe in terms of energy released per second, occurring during brief periods due to stellar collapses into black holes. In contrast, quasars are the most luminous static sources of energy, powered by supermassive black holes emitting intense radio waves. While GRBs are frequent and short-lived, quasars represent ancient cosmic phenomena primarily present in the early universe. The confusion arises from differing definitions of luminosity and energy output over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and their characteristics
  • Knowledge of quasars and their role in the universe
  • Familiarity with black hole formation and stellar evolution
  • Basic concepts of cosmic luminosity and energy emission
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms behind gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and their formation
  • Explore the properties and significance of quasars in astrophysics
  • Study the differences between transient and persistent astronomical phenomena
  • Investigate the historical context of quasars in the early universe
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophysicists, and students studying cosmic phenomena, particularly those interested in the comparison of luminous astronomical events.

aguycalledwil
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Okay, so this may be a little bit of a trivial question, but I've read conflicting information and found myself confused as a result.

I've read from several sources (wikipedia, books) that GRB's are the most luminous events known to occur in our universe.

However, I've also read that Quasars are 'the most energetic and luminous objects in the known universe' (the physics book - Cllifford A. Pickover).

So my question is, which is brighter? Nowhere that I've found on the net addresses the question. Some sites favour GRB's and others favour quasars, but nowhere compares them. Does anybody have any quantitive values?

Thanks in advance!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm probably remembering incorrectly, but aren't GRBs caused by Quasars, or at least we think so(?)
 
Not as far as I know.. I thought GRBs were short-lived bursts of gamma radiation as a result of a star's collapse into an ordinary black hole, which occur frequently all over the universe, whilst a quasar is an ancient supermassive black hole that emits intense radio waves. It's to my understanding that quasars were only present early on in the universe's history, which isn't true for GRBs? Maybe I'm mistaken..
 
aguycalledwil said:
Not as far as I know.. I thought GRBs were short-lived bursts of gamma radiation as a result of a star's collapse into an ordinary black hole, which occur frequently all over the universe, whilst a quasar is an ancient supermassive black hole that emits intense radio waves. It's to my understanding that quasars were only present early on in the universe's history, which isn't true for GRBs? Maybe I'm mistaken..

This is basically correct. The problem that the OP cites is mainly one of terminology. In terms of amount of energy released per second, GRBs are undoubtedly the most luminous events in the universe during the brief time over which they occur. Quasars, on the other hand, are the most luminous "static" sources of energy (I use quotation marks because quasars do show rapid variability).
 
Thanks very much, that makes sense to me! It's been bugging me for ages now, glad to get that cleared up. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K