Chemistry Which Method for Calculating Moles is More Effective?

  • Thread starter Thread starter supernova1203
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moles
Click For Summary
Both methods for calculating moles, n1=c1v1 and # of moles = mass/molar mass, are valid but applicable in different scenarios. The first method is useful for solutions, while the second is better for solid substances. The new method is essentially a rearrangement of the molar concentration formula. Additionally, there is a concern about a potential typo in the formula used for calculating moles of HCl, although the result was deemed correct. Understanding the context of each method is crucial for effective application.
supernova1203
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
Do both of these methods for calculating the number of moles work?

we've learned a new method recently which i prefer over the older method for current curriculum

n1=c1v1

n for number of moles, c for concentration 1 and v for volume 1
and the old method is

# of moles = mass/molar mass

does the first method work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are asking to compare apples and oranges. How are you going to use the second method to calculate number of moles in 1 L of 0.3M solution, how are you going to use first method to calculate number of moles in 6g of carbon? Both approaches are correct, but they are used in completely different situations.

Besides, what you call a "new method" is just a rearranged molar concentration definition (which you probably should know by now):

C = \frac n V

solve for n.
 
Also there is another question, I am certain there's a typo here, if not see if this makes sense (attachment)
 

Attachments

  • Does this make sense.jpg
    Does this make sense.jpg
    26.2 KB · Views: 539
Formula used to calculate number of moles of HCl is wrong, but otherwise result is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K