B Which one is correct? (the Matrix or Wave formulation of QM)

  • Thread starter Thread starter zoltrix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Qm Wave
Click For Summary
The matrix and wave formulations of quantum mechanics (QM) are equivalent, yielding the same results and are often used interchangeably by scientists. The choice between them depends on the specific problem at hand, with the matrix version being advantageous for systems like perturbations of the harmonic oscillator. Dirac's representation-free approach is considered the clearest, as it emphasizes the underlying unity of the theories. Ultimately, both formulations serve as different bases for solving the same quantum problems, and the distinction is more historical than practical. Understanding their equivalence enhances clarity in quantum theory applications.
zoltrix
Messages
85
Reaction score
7
hello

matrix and wave formulation of QM are equivalent theories i.e they yield the same results
Which one is most frequentely used by professional scientists in solving real problems and why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For example, some systems can be considered perturbations of the harmonic oscillator, so it is computationally efficient to work in the discrete harmonic oscillator basis.
 
Roughly, the matrix version is the formulation in terms of energy eigenvectors and eigenstates. The two formulations are identical, so in practice one goes seamlessly between the two fomulations. One doesn't think of them as separate formulations nowadays, as thinking of them as separate formulations is more confusing and historical than helpful. They are the same formulation.
 
That's why Dirac's formulation after all is the most clear formulation, because it is formulating QT in a "representation free" way. Then whether you do "wave mechanics" or "matrix mechanics" is simply the same theory using different bases to solve some problem, and which one is more convenient depends on the problem you want to solve.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K