Which one is correct? (the Matrix or Wave formulation of QM)

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zoltrix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Qm Wave
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The matrix and wave formulations of quantum mechanics (QM) are equivalent theories that yield identical results. Professional scientists often choose the formulation that is most computationally efficient for the problem at hand, such as using the discrete harmonic oscillator basis for perturbations of the harmonic oscillator. Dirac's representation-free formulation of quantum theory is considered the clearest, emphasizing that both formulations are interchangeable and serve the same theoretical purpose. The distinction between wave mechanics and matrix mechanics is largely historical and can lead to confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with Dirac notation and representation theory
  • Knowledge of harmonic oscillators in quantum systems
  • Basic grasp of computational methods in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Dirac's formulation of quantum theory
  • Explore the discrete harmonic oscillator basis in quantum mechanics
  • Research computational techniques for solving quantum mechanical problems
  • Examine the historical development of wave and matrix mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, computational physics, and theoretical physics, will benefit from this discussion.

zoltrix
Messages
85
Reaction score
7
hello

matrix and wave formulation of QM are equivalent theories i.e they yield the same results
Which one is most frequentely used by professional scientists in solving real problems and why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For example, some systems can be considered perturbations of the harmonic oscillator, so it is computationally efficient to work in the discrete harmonic oscillator basis.
 
Roughly, the matrix version is the formulation in terms of energy eigenvectors and eigenstates. The two formulations are identical, so in practice one goes seamlessly between the two fomulations. One doesn't think of them as separate formulations nowadays, as thinking of them as separate formulations is more confusing and historical than helpful. They are the same formulation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
That's why Dirac's formulation after all is the most clear formulation, because it is formulating QT in a "representation free" way. Then whether you do "wave mechanics" or "matrix mechanics" is simply the same theory using different bases to solve some problem, and which one is more convenient depends on the problem you want to solve.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
11K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K