B Which one is correct? (the Matrix or Wave formulation of QM)

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter zoltrix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Qm Wave
zoltrix
Messages
85
Reaction score
7
hello

matrix and wave formulation of QM are equivalent theories i.e they yield the same results
Which one is most frequentely used by professional scientists in solving real problems and why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For example, some systems can be considered perturbations of the harmonic oscillator, so it is computationally efficient to work in the discrete harmonic oscillator basis.
 
Roughly, the matrix version is the formulation in terms of energy eigenvectors and eigenstates. The two formulations are identical, so in practice one goes seamlessly between the two fomulations. One doesn't think of them as separate formulations nowadays, as thinking of them as separate formulations is more confusing and historical than helpful. They are the same formulation.
 
That's why Dirac's formulation after all is the most clear formulation, because it is formulating QT in a "representation free" way. Then whether you do "wave mechanics" or "matrix mechanics" is simply the same theory using different bases to solve some problem, and which one is more convenient depends on the problem you want to solve.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
127
Views
11K
Replies
71
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top