Which Set-up Has Greater Acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robershky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atwood Confusion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two setups of an Atwood's Machine, one with a hanging weight and the other with a person exerting a force. Participants are exploring the implications of these setups on acceleration, considering the forces involved and the masses of the components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the applied force and the resulting acceleration in both setups. Some suggest drawing free body diagrams to analyze forces, while others question how to account for mass in the second setup.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have proposed equations to analyze the forces and accelerations, while others are questioning the assumptions about mass and applied forces. There is no explicit consensus yet, but guidance has been offered regarding the use of equations to analyze the scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of mass in the second setup and are trying to reconcile this with the applied force of 10 N. There is an ongoing examination of how this affects the calculations and the overall understanding of the problem.

Robershky
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Modified Atwood's Machine has a 10 N cart on a frictionless, horizontal track with a 10 N hanging weight attached to a string connecting the two weights. A second track is set up with the hanging weight replaced by a person who can maintain a 10 N pull on the string (as measured with a force probe). Which set-up has the greater acceleration?


Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


Wouldn't they have equal acceleration since the force pulling them is the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Same externally applied force, but one system has twice the mass of the other. Draw a free body diagram of each mass for the first case and identify forces and solve for acceleration using Newton 2. Then look at case 2. Are the accelerations equal?
 
[tex]T = ma[/tex]
and for the hanging block
[tex]-T + mg = ma[/tex]
[tex]T = mg - ma[/tex]

plugging it into the first one:

[tex]mg - ma = ma[/tex]
[tex]a = g/2[/tex]

For case 2 we would have:

[tex]T = ma[/tex]

[tex]-T + F_{applied} = ma[/tex]
[tex]T = F_{applied} - ma[/tex]

plugging in for the first 1

[tex]F_{applied} - ma = ma[/tex]
[tex]a = \frac{10}{2*m}[/tex]

Both those equations yield the same acceleration. So they would be equal. Is that correct?
 
Robershky said:
[tex]T = ma[/tex]
and for the hanging block
[tex]-T + mg = ma[/tex]
[tex]T = mg - ma[/tex]

plugging it into the first one:

[tex]mg - ma = ma[/tex]
[tex]a = g/2[/tex]
This is correct
For case 2 we would have:

[tex]T = ma[/tex]
correct, for the cart
[tex]-T + F_{applied} = ma[/tex]
[tex]T = F_{applied} - ma[/tex]
but for this analysis of the force on the hanging rope, what is the value of 'm' to use? Is there any mass involved here?
 
I see, I forgot to differentiate which mass was which. There is an applied force of 10N, but no mass is used, how does that work?
 
Robershky said:
I see, I forgot to differentiate which mass was which. There is an applied force of 10N, but no mass is used, how does that work?
well, you can use your equation [tex]T = F_{applied} - ma[/tex] if you want, and set m=0 to solve for T. Then solve for the acceleration by plugging T into your equation for the cart. That's one way of doing it.
 
I think I got it. There would be more acceleration for the person pulling. Right?
 
Robershky said:
I think I got it. There would be more acceleration for the person pulling. Right?
Yes. A simpler way is to realize that the applied force at the hanging end (10N) is just the tension force in the string (10N), which is the same tension force accelerating the cart (thus, a=g for this case).
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K