Atwood's Machine: Understanding Acceleration and Tension

  • Thread starter Thread starter FScheuer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 4K views
FScheuer

Homework Statement



There is an Atwood machine (image attached) with 3 masses, m, 2m, and 3m.

Homework Equations



What is the acceleration of each mass?

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I’m not quite sure where to start here. I know that there is a gravitational force downward on each mass, mg, 2mg, and 3mg respectively. I also know that tension is pulling each of the masses upward. I think I would be able to begin solving the problem if I understood how the force of tension in the string was applied to each mass. Is the force of tension on each mass different?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0719.jpg
    IMG_0719.jpg
    2.9 KB · Views: 601
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can neglect friction and the pulleys are massless, the tension is the same in the entire string. What you need to do is to start making free body diagrams to your heart's delight. You will also need a constraint to keep the string length constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
Orodruin said:
If you can neglect friction and the pulleys are massless, the tension is the same in the entire string. What you need to do is to start making free body diagrams to your heart's delight. You will also need a constraint to keep the string length constant.
I set it all up and got .5g upward for the acceleration of the first two masses and .5g downward for the acceleration of the third. Does that seem correct?
 
FScheuer said:
I set it all up and got .5g upward for the acceleration of the first two masses and .5g downward for the acceleration of the third. Does that seem correct?
With those numbers, the string is getting longer at 1g. The first three lengths each get shorter at .5g while the last gets longer at .5g.
Please post your working.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
haruspex said:
With those numbers, the string is getting longer at 1g. The first three lengths each get shorter at .5g while the last gets longer at .5g.
Please post your working.
I set up three equations for the accelerations.

a1 = (mg + T)/m

a2 = (2mg + 2T)/2m

a3 = (3mg + T)/3m

I’m not quite sure how to use the constant string length as a constraint. Before I set a1 equal to a3 but I now realize that they are not necessarily equal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Orodruin said:
Write the total string length as a function of the displacement of the pulleys and differentiate it twice.
What exactly do you mean by that? Isn’t the total string length constant?
 
FScheuer said:
What exactly do you mean by that? Isn’t the total string length constant?

Yes. But it can also be expressed in terms of the displacements. This is the entire point. What happens when you differentiate a constant? What do you get out when you differentiate the displacements twice?

Since you have only three equations and four variables (the accelerations and the tension), you need this additional condition to solve the system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
Orodruin said:
Yes. But it can also be expressed in terms of the displacements. This is the entire point. What happens when you differentiate a constant? What do you get out when you differentiate the displacements twice?

Since you have only three equations and four variables (the accelerations and the tension), you need this additional condition to solve the system.
I added the equation and then solved to get -1/5mg for the first two masses, and 3/5mg for the third. This seems to match up with the answer I found online. Thanks.
 
FScheuer said:
I added the equation and then solved to get -1/5mg for the first two masses, and 3/5mg for the third. This seems to match up with the answer I found online. Thanks.
It is also the same result as I got (assuming that you define the positive direction to be down for all masses, which agrees with your sign for the gravitational term in post #5, but note that you have defined ##T## to be negative of the tension in the string as positive ##T## in those equations would lead to the tension accelerating the masses downwards too - of course this does not matter for the solution if you only solve for the accelerations, but it will matter if you are interested in the string tension).