Who do you think is more intelligent : Hawking or Tesla?

  • Thread starter Thread starter annoyinggirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hawking Tesla
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the comparison of intelligence between Stephen Hawking, a cosmologist, and Nikola Tesla, an engineer. Participants explore the criteria for intelligence, the significance of each figure, and the implications of comparing individuals from different fields. The conversation includes various perspectives on the value of such comparisons and the nature of intelligence itself.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that comparing Hawking and Tesla is inherently flawed due to their differing fields and the ambiguous definition of intelligence.
  • Others suggest that intelligence is a reification of various abilities, making direct comparisons pointless.
  • A few participants challenge the significance of Tesla, claiming he was overrated and not comparable to great physicists of his time.
  • Some assert that Tesla's contributions, while significant, are often exaggerated in popular culture, distinguishing between the real inventor and the mythical figure.
  • There are claims that Tesla was a brilliant engineer and inventor, with notable achievements in AC power systems and remote control technology.
  • Participants express differing opinions on who might be considered the most intelligent person in history, with names like Einstein and Archimedes mentioned.
  • Some responses indicate that the question itself is seen as trivial or nonsensical, with analogies to other comparisons like superheroes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the comparison of Hawking and Tesla, with multiple competing views on the significance and intelligence of both figures. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the criteria for intelligence and the validity of the comparison.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include the lack of a clear definition of intelligence, the subjective nature of the comparison, and the potential overemphasis on popular myths surrounding Tesla's legacy.

annoyinggirl
Messages
217
Reaction score
10
Ok, I admit i am comparing apples to oranges - cosmologist to engineer. But if you were to choose one based on intelligence, who would it be? If you regard neither of these two men as the most intelligent man who has ever lived, who do you regard as such?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Intelligence criterion poorly defined. Body of data insufficient. Range of solutions arbitrary.
Example follows:
 
Who is stronger? Superman or the Hulk?

These threads never go anywhere.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Who is stronger? Superman or the Hulk?

Obviously Batman.
 
I agree with Vanadium. This is an utterly pointless topic. You might as well have a beauty contest.

Zz.
 
annoyinggirl said:
If you regard neither of these two men as the most intelligent man who has ever lived, who do you regard as such?
A concept I first ran across somewhere in the writings of Henry Miller is that the greatest men are always anonymous. We'll never know the most intelligent person who has ever lived because they would have had the intelligence to stay out of the history books. I would also like to point out that Superman was more intelligent than the Hulk, but it's not clear that he was more intelligent than Batman.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
There is a Chinese parable about three brothers who are all doctors. The most famous is the youngest brother for his skill of healing even the most deadly of diseases and when people ask about it. He says his fame is because his skill is inferior to his brothers saying:

My oldest brother's knowledge is so great that he can can vanquish disease before it occurs and my older brother can cure disease in its earliest stages whereas I must deal with diseases when they are most serious.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
annoyinggirl said:
Ok, I admit i am comparing apples to oranges - cosmologist to engineer. But if you were to choose one based on intelligence, who would it be? If you regard neither of these two men as the most intelligent man who has ever lived, who do you regard as such?

I have to agree with everyone else here that discussions like this are pointless. To expand on why: intelligence is not great metric at all. It's not one characteristic but, I would argue, a reification of a range of different abilities. IMO it's ultimately pointless trying to judge and compare someone's intelligence versus their capability at a relevant subject.
 
annoyinggirl asks an annoying question...

Someone should really do a write-up dispelling the Tesla myth. Fact is Tesla was his own biggest promoter and he really isn't that significant of a figure. Toward the end of his life he became a total kook and recluse and died alone living in a Hotel. He's not even worth mentioning in the same breath as the great Physicists of his era.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule, WannabeNewton and phinds
  • #10
dipole said:
annoyinggirl asks an annoying question...

Someone should really do a write-up dispelling the Tesla myth. Fact is Tesla was his own biggest promoter and he really isn't that significant of a figure. Toward the end of his life he became a total kook and recluse and died alone living in a Hotel. He's not even worth mentioning in the same breath as the great Physicists of his era.

+1 on that !
 
  • #11
dipole said:
annoyinggirl asks an annoying question...

Someone should really do a write-up dispelling the Tesla myth. Fact is Tesla was his own biggest promoter and he really isn't that significant of a figure. Toward the end of his life he became a total kook and recluse and died alone living in a Hotel. He's not even worth mentioning in the same breath as the great Physicists of his era.
I suspect Tesla would not have lasted for a "New York Minute" on PF, but looking past his personality, his accomplishments ( documented ) show a very brilliant man. IMHO Tesla is not a myth.
Does Howard Hughes fall in your list of overrated people ? just curious :)
 
  • #12
RonL said:
I suspect Tesla would not have lasted for a "New York Minute" on PF, but looking past his personality, his accomplishments ( documented ) show a very brilliant man. IMHO Tesla is not a myth.
There are two Teslas:
-The Tesla who was a real person and a reasonably successful inventor -- having one big, successful invention -- is rarely ever discussed on the internet that I've seen.
-The Tesla people bring up is the mythical mad scientist who had tons of great but never fully realized inventions, because, conspiracy theory, conspiracy theory.

Given that the OP believes Tesla was one of the most intelligent people ever to exist, she most definitely is talking about Tesla, the mythical mad scientist, not Tesla, the real person.
Does Howard Hughes fall in your list of overrated people ? just curious :)
No. Mostly because Hughes was much more accomplished than Tesla.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Enigman and phinds
  • #13
Enigman said:
Obviously Batman.
There may not be a right answer to that question, but there couldn't be one more wrong! Batman has no superpowers!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cool4Kat
  • #14
ZapperZ said:
I agree with Vanadium. This is an utterly pointless topic. You might as well have a beauty contest.

Einstein. Ladies can't resist that hair.
 
  • #15
L
russ_watters said:
There may not be a right answer to that question, but there couldn't be one more wrong! Batman has no superpowers!
LOL, good point :)
 
  • #16
dipole said:
Someone should really do a write-up dispelling the Tesla myth. Fact is Tesla was his own biggest promoter and he really isn't that significant of a figure. Toward the end of his life he became a total kook and recluse and died alone living in a Hotel. He's not even worth mentioning in the same breath as the great Physicists of his era.

RonL said:
I suspect Tesla would not have lasted for a "New York Minute" on PF, but looking past his personality, his accomplishments ( documented ) show a very brilliant man. IMHO Tesla is not a myth.

Tesla was primarily an engineer, not a physicist, so of course you can't compare him to physicists of his era. It's important to distinguish between Tesla's contributions from his inventions, and the overblown status many people give him today. He was obviously a brilliant engineer and inventor, but he definitely wasn't a proverbial "god" who invented new physics that was squashed by the government and all that other conspiracy nonsense.
 
  • #17
My vote goes to mad Tesla, than to Superman. Hawking who?
 
  • #18
Feynman not mentioned yet? :( "the most intelligent" is impossible to find out or even define, but some certainly belong in the top group.
 
  • #19
Again, stupid question/stupid answer situation (no offense: see my half full/half empty thread for details).
It's obvious that Hawking is more intelligent than Tesla. Telsa's brain hasn't worked since 1943. :rolleyes:
 
  • #20
You're all wrong it's Archimedes...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Enigman
  • #21
annoyinggirl said:
Ok, I admit i am comparing apples to oranges - cosmologist to engineer. But if you were to choose one based on intelligence, who would it be? If you regard neither of these two men as the most intelligent man who has ever lived, who do you regard as such?

Like you said,...

...which do you like better: Apples, or Oranges?
 
  • #22
dipole said:
annoyinggirl asks an annoying question...

Someone should really do a write-up dispelling the Tesla myth. Fact is Tesla was his own biggest promoter and he really isn't that significant of a figure. Toward the end of his life he became a total kook and recluse and died alone living in a Hotel. He's not even worth mentioning in the same breath as the great Physicists of his era.
He was an extremely important contributor, and very productive.
 
  • #23
symbolipoint said:
He was an extremely important contributor, and very productive.
Citations?
 
  • #24
Evo said:
Citations?
He argued and demonstrated that AC was superior to DC as the basis for a large scale electrical delivery system, and Westinghouse bought all his patents. He invented the now ubiquitous AC operated induction motor, which has a big advantage over the universal motor for long life and quiet operation. He also invented and demonstrated remote (wireless) control, which paved the way for today's drones. As an engineer, he was an important contributor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
  • #25
zoobyshoe said:
He argued and demonstrated that AC was superior to DC as the basis for a large scale electrical delivery system, and Westinghouse bought all his patents. He invented the now ubiquitous AC operated induction motor, which has a big advantage over the universal motor for long life and quiet operation. He also invented and demonstrated remote (wireless) control, which paved the way for today's drones. As an engineer, he was an important contributor.
trut6h.

Tesla Didn’t Invent Alternating Current And He Wasn’t A Major Power In The War Of The Currents

Let’s start with the first thing the comic says: “In a time when the majority of the world was still lit by candle power, an electrical system known as alternating current and to this day is what powers every home on the planet. Who do we have to thank for this invention that ushered humanity into a second industrial revolution? Nikola Tesla.”

This is just wrong. Alternating current was developed in principle by Michael Faraday and in practice by Hippolyte Pixii in the early 19th century. Practical devices employing AC in the medical world were developed before Tesla was even born. Contemporaries of Tesla working for George Westinghouse developed practical methods of distributing AC power from power plants before Tesla came to work for Westinghouse. Tesla himself actually studied the use of AC in college – he had an electrical engineering degree. (For those interested, here’s a nice, concise timeline of the development of alternating current.)

Now, did Tesla help refine AC? Yes. Did he make some key innovations that made it even more practical? Absolutely. There’s no question about it. He had an intuitive understanding of electricity that I quite frankly envy. He could make it dance. But was he indispensable to getting AC in place as the dominant means of electric power transmission? Almost certainly not.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkna...-wasnt-god-and-thomas-edison-wasnt-the-devil/
 
  • #26
zoobyshoe said:
He argued and demonstrated that AC was superior to DC as the basis for a large scale electrical delivery system, and Westinghouse bought all his patents. He invented the now ubiquitous AC operated induction motor, which has a big advantage over the universal motor for long life and quiet operation.
Those two are basically the same contribution. It's a good one though.
He also invented and demonstrated remote (wireless) control, which paved the way for today's drones.
Agreed, kinda. As long as it took to get from there to here, I'm not sure it can be considered a direct connection.
As an engineer, he was an important contributor.
"Important" is a bit vague. He'd probably make a top 100 list of "important" engineers/inventors based on his one big invention, but I'm not sure it would be easy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cool4Kat
  • #27
russ_watters said:
There may not be a right answer to that question, but there couldn't be one more wrong! Batman has no superpowers!
45db51849c7dc4edbf8bece6cbe5b95c3443789274f67b22b164699d5dde0032.jpg


P.S. no mention of Newton? (let alone the old ton)​
 
  • #29
I am most offended by the comment that Batman is not the strongest one between Superman and the Hulk. The answer is always batman guys.
 
  • #30
Of course Tesla(the real!) was smart enough to have almost 300 inventions that at least a few of them were responsible for some technological leaps. But since I don't have enough information about other great inventors, I don't say he was the greatest inventor.(In no way, I would compare him to non-inventor scientists, the apple-orange stuff I mean!)
But about Stephen Hawking. I hope I won't bother his fans here(if there is any!), but his fame doesn't come from a really ground-breaking physical theory. Of course he had some good ideas and he is an important physicist but the things he did as a physicist don't imply such a world-wide fame! He's mostly famous because of his health situation and also because he's too much in media. Otherwise there are physicists with more important contributions than Hawking's, both dead and alive, but not as famous as him!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K