Who is better at Math, a physicist or a mathematician?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparative mathematical abilities of physicists and mathematicians. It asserts that while physicists can often excel as autodidact mathematicians due to their rigorous mindset, mathematicians may struggle to self-teach physics. The conversation highlights that both fields attract highly intelligent individuals, but personal preferences and inclinations significantly influence their capabilities. Notably, figures like Ed Witten illustrate that interdisciplinary excellence can occur, as he won the Fields Medal despite being primarily recognized as a physicist.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of autodidactic learning principles
  • Familiarity with the Fields Medal and its significance in mathematics
  • Basic knowledge of the differences between physics and mathematics as disciplines
  • Awareness of notable figures in both fields, such as Ed Witten
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of interdisciplinary skills in STEM fields
  • Explore the criteria for the Fields Medal and its recipients
  • Investigate the learning methodologies of successful autodidacts in mathematics and physics
  • Examine case studies of engineers excelling in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in STEM fields, particularly those interested in the interplay between mathematics and physics, as well as autodidactic learners seeking to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each discipline.

timpani
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Who is better in Math?

I was told that a physicist may be a good autodidact mathematician, but a mathematician may be a mediocre autodidact physicist.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
timpani said:
I was told that a physicist may be a good autodidact mathematician, but a mathematician may be a mediocre autodidact physicist.

Most physicists who teach themselves pure mathematics are mathematicians at heart, i.e. they have the mindset and the taste for mathematical rigour that is required for high level pure math. I suppose it goes the other way around too: a mathematician can have a taste and mindset for physics, and therefore be able to teach it to himself. I think it all comes down to that really, both fields have extremely intelligent and capable people, but their personal preferences are not the same.
It might be less common for a mathematician to like physics, but I can't say if that's true for sure.
 
Last edited:
timpani said:
I was told that a physicist may be a good autodidact mathematician, but a mathematician may be a mediocre autodidact physicist.

And both may be mediocre cooks. Or mediocre crooks. Or whatever.

People are different, so yes, you will probably find examples for every such a statement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: S.G. Janssens and billy_joule
Do not exclude the other disciplines. Some engineers (Kálmán, Luenberger,...) are better at mathematics that some mathematicians will likely ever be.

Come to think of it, on this forum I go by name of an engineer, although in my mind he is more of an early numerical analyst.
 
Last edited:
Ed Witten, ostensibly a physicist, (but a history major in undergrad), won the highest award in mathematics, the Fields medal. Has any mathematician ever won (or deserved) a physics award? (Gauss, Riemann, Archimedes, Arnol'd?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K