Bad at math and great at physics, explain this paradox?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the perceived paradox of physicists and engineers excelling in their fields while claiming to be "bad at math." Participants assert that while physicists utilize applied mathematics such as calculus, differential equations, and linear algebra, they may not engage with advanced mathematical proofs as mathematicians do. The conversation highlights that the term "bad at math" varies in meaning, often reflecting a lack of confidence rather than actual inability. Notably, figures like Einstein sought assistance from mathematicians for complex mathematical concepts, indicating that collaboration is common in the sciences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of applied mathematics, including calculus and differential equations.
  • Familiarity with the differences between pure mathematics and applied mathematics.
  • Knowledge of the roles of physicists and mathematicians in scientific research.
  • Awareness of the educational pathways in physics and engineering disciplines.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of applied mathematics in physics, focusing on calculus and differential equations.
  • Explore the differences between pure mathematics and applied mathematics in academic settings.
  • Investigate the collaborative nature of physics and mathematics, particularly in complex problem-solving.
  • Examine case studies of renowned physicists, such as Einstein, and their interactions with mathematicians.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in physics and engineering, educators in mathematics, and anyone interested in the interplay between mathematics and physical sciences.

  • #31
russ_watters said:
Don't these questions have obvious answers.
After a Mentor discussion, this thread will remain closed. Thanks to all who tried to help the OP with their questions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
640
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K