Bad at math and great at physics, explain this paradox?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between mathematics and physics at the university level, highlighting that many successful physicists and engineers may struggle with certain mathematical concepts. It argues that while mathematics is essential for physics, the type of math used often differs from pure mathematics, focusing more on applied techniques. The conversation touches on the notion that being "bad" at math can be subjective, as many who excel in physics may still face challenges in advanced mathematics. It also emphasizes that the perception of difficulty in math varies among individuals, and success in physics does not necessarily require mastery of all mathematical fields. Ultimately, the dialogue suggests that the distinction between math and physics involves different approaches and intuitions rather than a clear-cut divide in capability.
  • #31
russ_watters said:
Don't these questions have obvious answers.
After a Mentor discussion, this thread will remain closed. Thanks to all who tried to help the OP with their questions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
367
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
781
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
341