Who is better at Math, a physicist or a mathematician?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the comparative mathematical abilities of physicists and mathematicians, exploring whether one group is inherently better at mathematics than the other. It touches on personal preferences, the ability to self-teach in each discipline, and the contributions of individuals from related fields such as engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that physicists can be good autodidact mathematicians, while mathematicians may struggle with physics.
  • Others argue that personal mindset and preferences play a significant role in one's ability to excel in either field, suggesting that both physicists and mathematicians can possess the necessary skills for the other discipline.
  • A participant humorously suggests that both groups may also be mediocre in unrelated skills, indicating the variability among individuals.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that engineers can sometimes outperform mathematicians in mathematics, citing specific historical figures as examples.
  • A later reply highlights Ed Witten's achievements in mathematics as a physicist, questioning if any mathematicians have received similar recognition in physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the capabilities of physicists versus mathematicians, with no clear consensus on which group is better at mathematics. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the subjective nature of personal preferences and abilities, as well as the lack of definitive criteria for measuring mathematical skill across disciplines.

timpani
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Who is better in Math?

I was told that a physicist may be a good autodidact mathematician, but a mathematician may be a mediocre autodidact physicist.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
timpani said:
I was told that a physicist may be a good autodidact mathematician, but a mathematician may be a mediocre autodidact physicist.

Most physicists who teach themselves pure mathematics are mathematicians at heart, i.e. they have the mindset and the taste for mathematical rigour that is required for high level pure math. I suppose it goes the other way around too: a mathematician can have a taste and mindset for physics, and therefore be able to teach it to himself. I think it all comes down to that really, both fields have extremely intelligent and capable people, but their personal preferences are not the same.
It might be less common for a mathematician to like physics, but I can't say if that's true for sure.
 
Last edited:
timpani said:
I was told that a physicist may be a good autodidact mathematician, but a mathematician may be a mediocre autodidact physicist.

And both may be mediocre cooks. Or mediocre crooks. Or whatever.

People are different, so yes, you will probably find examples for every such a statement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: S.G. Janssens and billy_joule
Do not exclude the other disciplines. Some engineers (Kálmán, Luenberger,...) are better at mathematics that some mathematicians will likely ever be.

Come to think of it, on this forum I go by name of an engineer, although in my mind he is more of an early numerical analyst.
 
Last edited:
Ed Witten, ostensibly a physicist, (but a history major in undergrad), won the highest award in mathematics, the Fields medal. Has any mathematician ever won (or deserved) a physics award? (Gauss, Riemann, Archimedes, Arnol'd?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K