difalcojr
- 365
- 255
think this classic, slow tune could be fused up or rocked up in a cover.
morrobay said:Indeed it's not about nostalgia - Just the best jazz ever.
pinball1970 said:Once reason jazz and Classical are so great is they feature beautiful sounds of all the different instruments.
Does not all music do that?
Well yes and no, in rock music (which I like) you are a little restricted, guitar/distorted guitar, organ but not always.
Same with the other styles but in classical you can do what the hell you want, a piano piece? You have it.
Just Cello? Yes, Just voices? Full orchestra? Organ its all there.
Same with Jazz, this one is a flute piece but there is a cool as hell electric piano solo.
BWV said:The studio recording w/ strings is probably my favorite piano solo ever
I don’t agree with this at all, Jazz has a vocabulary and grammar, I.e. ‘rules’ , just as 19th century classical music or any other style doessbrothy said:In Jazz there are really no rules, musical theory-wise. If a chromatic scale or blue note sounds cool they go for it. I know that's not really fair comparing to other typea of music, but Jazz is really the very definition of musical anarchy. These people are so good they absorbed all the theory and then threw it all away to just play some music.
I have no technical musical knowledge whatsoever but I dare say the musicians got a little carried away with this no rules/anarchy/fusion that started in the 70's. For me does not sound good at allsbrothy said:In Jazz there are really no rules, musical theory-wise. If a chromatic scale or blue note sounds cool they go for it. I know that's not really fair comparing to other typea of music, but Jazz is really the very definition of musical anarchy. These people are so good they absorbed all the theory and then threw it all away to just play some music.
You're probably right. It was a very personal opinion. I play the guitar myself (mostly blues), but I'm not the biggest fan of jazz. Perhaps I'm too far out of my comfort zone here to offer any meaningful comment.BWV said:I don’t agree with this at all, Jazz has a vocabulary and grammar, I.e. ‘rules’ , just as 19th century classical music or any other style does
I think I know where you are coming from.sbrothy said:You're probably right. It was a very personal opinion. I play the guitar myself (mostly blues), but I'm not the biggest fan of jazz. Perhaps I'm too far out of my comfort zone here to offer any meaningful comment.
don't think this one made it yet:BadgerBadger92 said:I’ve always liked Herbie Hancock
An absolute stack of stuff that will blow your socks off Greg!Greg Bernhardt said:I'm a huge fan of 20s-40s jazz. I'm not big into any modern jazz.
difalcojr said:Had not remembered it was so pervasive in media. Interesting. The musicians did cover all the Broadway and movie themes and songs. Which I really like still. That Wilder movie trailer script is really funny. :)
As far as different guitar styles/sounds of jazz and rock, guitar always seemed so much more subdued in jazz. Didn't rock. Here's a pair that really show this, I think. Both renowned guitarists. Like both versions, but they are very different. The jazz version original (first track):
and the rock/blues fusion version cover with Mike Bloomfield in the first guitar solo, and Elvin Bishop the second. Harmonica taking the place of cornet. I think this might well be considered jazz too:
difalcojr said:Please post more. It's all good.
I only know 60's jazz mostly, all from my older brother who loved it. I don't think 60's jazz is considered modern, is it? Here's one my brother played a lot. My favorite album of his.
difalcojr said:I liked jazz because they played off-key on purpose and made it sound good.
difalcojr said:few more sixties before older stack starts.
The Billie Holiday song was very hard to listen to. Guess what I don't like in jazz is the opposite of what I do like. What has already been said it can be: upbeat, uplifting, driving. Or slow and sweet, but not melancholy or too sad and bluesy for me either.pinball1970 said:I would class that as "blues" rather than jazz. I know there is cross over but I am not a fan of it particularly. The format.
Not sure why. There were just so, so many jazz musicians in the 50's and 60's. Many, many great piano players and saxophone players. Wikipedia defines this sound as soul jazz.Hornbein said:As far as great small combo jazz goes you can't beat Sonny Stitt and Gene Ammons. Some real chemistry there. I don't know why they aren't more famous.
Dixieland jazz I have seen. There was a group call Orchestra De La Luz that moved to Latin America and was quite popular for a number of years. I've also seen 50's rock done very well. Very few tribute bands and they all seem to be for The Beatles. Superfly was very popular, doing 60's rock sort of like the Rolling Stones. I think they were great. Techo was invented by Germany and Japan and evolved into hiphop. The Yellow Magic Orchestra appeared on Soul Train.difalcojr said:Not sure why. There were just so, so many jazz musicians in the 50's and 60's. Many, many great piano players and saxophone players. Wikipedia defines this sound as soul jazz.
Maybe the Japanese bands will start some tours soon where you live so you don't have to move. I think they would fill much more than a small nightclub or racetrack side stage.
BB King performed at Harrah's casino on a small, side stage during the daytime at a time in his life. He also filled the SF Fillmore Auditorium as often as he wanted.
Also, are the Japanese bands there also playing Dixieland jazz?
Or jazz with Latin beats like this one.
Found out it was Oliver Nelson who wrote the scores for Ironside, Columbo, The Six Million Dollar Man, and The Death of a Gunfighter. Here is his "Stolen Moments".pinball1970 said:One of the reason I was hooked on USA TV & film as a kid, jazz music permeated children and adult TV, film sound tracks.