Who Is Your Favorite Scientist and Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BadgerBadger92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scientist
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around personal favorites in the scientific community, highlighting influential figures in various fields. Isaac Newton is recognized for his foundational contributions to motion and gravity, while Erwin Schrödinger is appreciated for his pivotal equation in quantum mechanics. Participants express admiration for lesser-known scientists who significantly impacted their specific subfields. The conversation also touches on notable figures in life sciences, such as Darwin and Mendel, and acknowledges the broader influence of Einstein and Richard Feynman, particularly in physics. The dialogue reflects a mix of well-known and niche scientists, emphasizing their lasting impact on individual careers and the scientific community as a whole.
BadgerBadger92
Messages
168
Reaction score
87
I’m interested in seeing what your opinions are. I was hoping to learn a thing or two from what you prefer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, @BadgerBadger92. Newton: he put the first brick, provided all the background, to which we are all devoted.
HNY
 
  • Like
Likes Math100, BadgerBadger92 and PhDeezNutz
My favorite scientist is Isaac Newton because he developed the laws of motion and gravity.
 
Erwin Schrödinger, because without his epononymous equation, I'd be doing chemistry blindly.
 
Just one! I don't think one page will be enough to list all my favourites.
 
My favorite scientists were high performers in my specific subfield that influenced me when I was starting out. Of course, no one has heard of them in the general community. Off the famous list, I have read and thought about specific papers by Mott, Taylor and Bethe.
 
Last edited:
BadgerBadger92 said:
I’m interested in seeing what your opinions are. I was hoping to learn a thing or two from what you prefer.
Life sciences UG so Darwin and Mendel are obvious choices and later the biochemistry and medicine/pathology pioneers.

However, this is PF so in terms of awe inspiring, Einstein and his achievements plus his challenges and errors also seem to lead to advancements.

Probably get pulled on that but I don’t care.

Feynman also- no idea who he was until challenger 1986 and it took a few conversations with physics undergraduates, until I realized how important he was.

My physics mates all said Newton but what do they know?
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
400
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top