Who set the values of Physics Constants?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter usm4nq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Physics Set
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins and definitions of physical constants, exploring whether they are set values or derived from chosen units. Participants examine the nature of constants of proportionality and the implications of unit definitions on the values of these constants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that all physical constants can be viewed as constants of proportionality, but the confirmation of this idea is uncertain.
  • One participant argues that constants are not set values but rather arise from the choice of units, indicating that different units would yield different numerical values for the same physical constant.
  • Another participant clarifies that the definition of a constant of proportionality is straightforward, but the significance of the constants themselves is more complex, suggesting that some constants relate simple, identifiable quantities while others do not.
  • It is noted that the speed of light's value is a consequence of how the meter and second are defined, not due to any inherent physical significance of the number itself.
  • Participants mention that the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) plays a role in setting the values of fundamental constants and that this authority is derived from international treaties.
  • One participant humorously distances themselves from the creation of physical constants, indicating a light-hearted perspective on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the values of constants are influenced by the units chosen, but there are competing views on the implications of this relationship and the nature of constants of proportionality. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader significance of these constants.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the historical context of unit definitions and their evolution, as well as the distinction between constants that are dependent on units and those that have direct physical significance.

usm4nq
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Where do these Physical Constant come from? who set the values for these Constants?
Hello,

I am writing a blog post about Physics Constant. I recently found out how you can find out the Constant of Proportionality. and had an idea that all the Physics Constants were Constants of Proportionality. but I have no idea how to confirm this because there are so many. so I don't know if I am right or wrong and it is keeping me from writing my blog post.

  • Avogadro’s number:
    293055.image0.png
  • Boltzmann’s constant:
    293056.image1.png
  • Mass of electron:

    293057.image2.png

  • Speed of light:
    293059.image4.png
  • Gravitational constant:
    a
    293060.image5.png
  • Gas constant:
    293061.image6.png
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody set any constants. We set the units. Meter, kilogram, or seconds have been defined for convenience in our macroscopic world. Some like the second date back to the Babylonians, the meter IIRC to Napoleon. They fit in our daily business. It is an unintended consequence that the speed of light has a strange value. It's the units, not the values which determine the figures. Different units would give different values.

You should research the history of units for your blog. The constants are a consequence of that. But people prefer to have a convenient unit for ##2\, kg## of apples, rather than ##G = 10^{-9}\,N\,m^2\,kg^{-2}##.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: davenn, sysprog and anorlunda
The definition of a constant of proportionality is very simple and doesn’t really say anything about the basis of the constant. If you can write:

x = c y

then c is a constant of proportionality between x and y. Usually the units give a good indication. If the units are A/B it is probably a constant of proportionality. An exception is Avagadro’s number because “number” is unitless. With more complicated units you could still say the constant is a constant of proportionality between two quantities. For example you could say G is the proportionality between ##kg^2## and ##N m^2##, i.e. the product of the masses related to the product of the force times the distance squared, but those don’t seem like useful individual things. So I would add the additional “requirement” that a constant of proportionality relates two quantities that are themselves relatively simple, identifiable, and useful. Given thatI would classify these constants in your list as constants of proportionality:

Avagadro’s number relates number of atoms to number of moles,

N = ##N_A## mol

Boltzmann’s constant relates thermal energy to temperature.

E = ##k_b## T

Speed of light relates distance traveled to time

d = c t

I don’t think being a constant of proportionality is particularly profound. For example every change of units involves a constant of proportionality. Your question of the origins of constants is a much more profound and interesting topic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
usm4nq said:
Where do these Physical Constant come from? who set the values for these Constants?
As fresh_42 says above, we don’t set the value of the constants, we choose the units and that determines the numerical value we use for the constant. The speed of light is 299792458 meters per second because that’s how we defined the meter and the second, not because there’s anything physically significant about the number 299792458. These unit definitions are generally created and managed by various international standards organizations such as https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Conference_on_Weights_and_Measures.

There are constants that are independent of the units, and these are the only ones that have a direct physical significance. A good example is the “fine structure constant” - google for it, and look for threads here that discuss it in the context of the speed of light.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog and gmax137
The values of many of the fundamental constants are set by BIPM. See www.bipm.org.

It is true that historically BIPM chose the units, and that those definitions were used to determine the numerical values of the constants, but as of a few months ago they changed that.

BIPM gets its authority to do this by international treaty. It all started in, if I recall correctly, in the 1870's. Do a google search for Treaty of the Meter.
 
I admit it: it wasn't me; I didn't make up the constants. I would be happy to take the credit, but I emphatically want to stay away from taking any of the blame. I didn't pass the second law of thermodynamics either, and I would be ok with issuing permits to violate it on an ad hoc basis, if i could get the 'powers that be' to go along with that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Anand Sivaram

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K