Who was the first one to say universe is expanding?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LSulayman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expanding Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the historical development of the idea that the universe is expanding, exploring contributions from various scientists such as Hubble, Friedmann, and Einstein. Participants examine the evidence and theoretical frameworks that led to the acceptance of an expanding universe, including observational data and the evolution of cosmological theories.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Hubble is credited with providing the first observational evidence for the expanding universe.
  • Others note that Friedmann developed the expanding solutions to General Relativity in the early 1920s, but his ideas were not widely accepted or linked to physical reality at the time.
  • There is a question about whether Hubble's observations in 1929 validated Friedmann's earlier theoretical work.
  • Some participants discuss the timeline of Einstein's field equations and the introduction of the cosmological constant, suggesting that Einstein initially did not believe in an expanding universe.
  • One participant mentions that Hubble's estimates of the universe's age were not accurate by today's standards, despite being the first to provide evidence for a finite age.
  • There is a reference to the steady-state theory proposed by Bondi, Gold, and Hoyle, and how it contrasts with the expanding universe models.
  • Some participants highlight the lack of consensus among scientists for several decades regarding the nature of the universe's expansion.
  • There is a discussion about the influence of Einstein's approval on the acceptance of Friedmann's solutions and the subsequent development of the Big Bang theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on who should be credited with the idea of an expanding universe, with some emphasizing Hubble's observational contributions and others highlighting Friedmann's theoretical groundwork. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise historical attribution of the concept and the implications of each scientist's contributions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexities of the historical timeline, including the development of various theories and the influence of individual scientists' reputations on the acceptance of ideas. There are references to unresolved debates about the interpretations of redshift and the implications of different cosmological models.

LSulayman
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Who was the first one to come up with the idea that the universe is expanding, and also had a form of evidence for it?
Was is Friedmann, Sitter, Hubble or Einstein himself? Or was it someone else?
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Hubble.
 
Calimero said:
Hubble.

Was it really Hubble? So he came up with redshift before Friedmann came up with the Friedmann equations?
 
Friedmann came up with the expanding solution of GR in the early '20s, but it was not until 1929 when it was tested against observations by Hubble.
 
cristo said:
Friedmann came up with the expanding solution of GR in the early '20s, but it was not until 1929 when it was tested against observations by Hubble.

So Friedmann came up with the idea of an expanding universe first with his solutions, but it was not until Hubble's observations that it could be proven?
 
Well, Hubble, for sure, is the first man who came up with observational evidence. It is, I think, true that Friedmann came up with EFE expanding universe solution few years earlier, but as far as I know, he was not at all convinced that it has anything to do with physical reality, let alone that his work will become the standard for modern cosmology.
 
Calimero said:
Well, Hubble, for sure, is the first man who came up with observational evidence. It is, I think, true that Friedmann came up with EFE expanding universe solution few years earlier, but as far as I know, he was not at all convinced that it has anything to do with physical reality, let alone that his work will become the standard for modern cosmology.

So if I want to explain the expanding universe to someone I should first talk about Hubble and then Friedmann? (keeping all the other things aside for now)
 
Well, that depends on your narative skills, but probably. Keep in mind that Hubble also showed that our universe is not consisting of only one galaxy (Milky way), which was prevailing thought at the time.
 
Calimero said:
Well, that depends on your narative skills, but probably. Keep in mind that Hubble also showed that our universe is not consisting of only one galaxy (Milky way), which was prevailing thought at the time.

Was Hubble also the first one to measure the age of the universe? (by using Hubble's law)
 
  • #10
He provided first direct observational evidence that universe must be finite in age, but his estimates of that age were far from values that we today consider correct.
 
  • #11
A)
B) Steady-state theory, Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle.
C) Einstein field equations with cosmological constant included to have a theory consistent with steady state.
D) Fredmann equations for expanding universe.
E) Hubble
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Calimero said:
He provided first direct observational evidence that universe must be finite in age, but his estimates of that age were far from values that we today consider correct.

But he was actually the first one to do that using the Hubble Law?
I'm also measuring the age by using redshift, H etc., that's why I want to know...
 
  • #13
Phrak said:
A)
B) Steady-state theory, Proposed in 1948 by Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle.
C) Einstein field equations with cosmological constant included to have a theory consistent with steady state.
D) Fredmann equations for expanding universe.
E) Hubble

Weren't Einstein's equations before 1948?
 
  • #14
Is it true that General Relativity showed the universe was expanding, but Einstein did not believe this to be true?
That is, until Hubble came along?
 
  • #15
Hubble was not an iconoclast regarding Universal expansion. Far from it. Even in a paper published in 1953 (after his death), he said "c x z = velocity is not formally correct". Gamow et al enshrined him as the "discoverer" of Universal expansion, but Hubble would not have been willing to make that leap. Throughout his career, he spent his efforts showing that (using distance indicators like Cepheids and extrapolations from galaxy morphology and luminosity) redshift was correlated in a linear fashion with distance.

I once had two sites bookmarked with access to full-text HTML files of his papers, and both links seem to be dead right now.
 
  • #16
fillipeano said:
Is it true that General Relativity showed the universe was expanding, but Einstein did not believe this to be true?
That is, until Hubble came along?

Yep, right to the point you can actually say that's true.
 
  • #17
LSulayman said:
Weren't Einstein's equations before 1948?

Not much of a time line is it? There was no general consensus for a few decades. Einstein published his field equations between 1905 and 1916. You could say general relativity was completed in 1916 with cosmological constant included. Hilbert actually got the jump on the last brick in the wall in 1915. Though even as late as perhaps the 1980s, Hoyle was still advancing a steady state theory. Alexander Friedmann, Georges Lemaitre, Howard Robertson and Arthur Geoffrey Walker developed expanding universe solutions in the 20s and 30s.
 
  • #18
Phrak said:
Not much of a time line is it? There was no general consensus for a few decades. Einstein published his field equations between 1905 and 1916. You could say general relativity was completed in 1916 with cosmological constant included. Hilbert actually got the jump on the last brick in the wall in 1915. Though even as late as perhaps the 1980s, Hoyle was still advancing a steady state theory. Alexander Friedmann, Georges Lemaitre, Howard Robertson and Arthur Geoffrey Walker developed expanding universe solutions in the 20s and 30s.

According to Simon Singh's "Big Bang", Einstein introduced the cosmological constant to have a static solution. It was considered an ugly modification by most scientists, even by Einstein himself, but a steady state universe was the only imaginable possibility at the time. Friedmann then came up with his famous equations, but while Einstein acknowledged the correctness of the solutions, he still rejected it and deemed it "unphysical". And at the time, if you wanted the approval of the scientific community, you needed Einstein's approval. Friedmann died shortly after and his solution was largely ignored until Lamaitre came up with the same solution independently and actually applied them to the universe, thinking of a primeval atom and such, unlike Friedmann who was a mathematician first and an astrophysicist second. The big bang theory was born, but Einstein didn't change his mind, so Lemaitre gave up as well. Then Hubble measured the recession of galaxies and Einstein finally gave in, along with the rest of the physicists.

It's all in the book, a great read. I highly recommend it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K