Who Will Replace Abdul Kalam as India's President?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter siddharth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    India
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the upcoming election for the President of India, specifically focusing on the potential replacement of Abdul Kalam. Participants express concerns about the qualifications and integrity of the leading candidate, Prathiba Patil, and reflect on the political landscape and public sentiment regarding the election process.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Prathiba Patil, the leading candidate, has allegations of corruption associated with her, including financial irregularities linked to a bank she owned.
  • Another participant expresses disappointment that Abdul Kalam, a respected scientist, is not running for a second term, suggesting that the political system is flawed.
  • Some participants question the focus on Patil's gender and regional background rather than her policies or qualifications.
  • There is a shared sentiment that many politicians are perceived as corrupt or delusional, with references to other political figures as being worse than Patil.
  • Concerns are raised about the overall political environment and the lack of value placed on qualified individuals, leading to a brain drain as talented individuals seek opportunities abroad.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the dissatisfaction with the political candidates and the electoral process, but there are varying opinions on the extent of corruption and the implications of Patil's candidacy. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path forward for the presidency.

Contextual Notes

Participants express frustration with the political system and the perceived lack of integrity among candidates. There are references to previous presidents and the historical context of political corruption, but no specific resolutions or conclusions are drawn.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in Indian politics, electoral processes, and discussions surrounding leadership qualifications may find this discussion relevant.

siddharth
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
1,145
Reaction score
0
In the near future, the members of parliment of the Indian government are set to elect a new president, who'd replace Abdul Kalam (a scientist) as the president of India. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6748839.stm)

I recently found out that the leading candidate (who has the backing of the majority of the ruling party), Prathiba Patil, claims to have http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/jun/27prezpoll.htm" .

Apart from that, there are the usual allegations of corruption that goes in every politicians resume. In her case, there's some factual evidence that the bank she owned had it's license revoked because of financial irregularities, such as giving huge loans to relatives who didn't repay, etc (http://www.indianexpress.com/story/202794.html").

I think it's such a pity that they are forcing out a scientist and replacing him with someone who claims to speak with dead people. I don't know about her, but generally, I'd consider people who claim to speak to dead people (without evidence) as delusional

What's really funny (or depressing), is that no one actually cares about her policies or qualifications. One bunch of politicians are backing her cause of her gender (If you don't support her, you're against the cause of women!). Another bunch? Cause she's from Maharashtra, just like us!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Who isn't corrupt and/or delusional? Those with the power make her look like an amateur. Abdul Kalam used his position to the fullest and it is unfortunate that he won't be running for a second term.

What's really funny (or depressing), is that no one actually cares about her policies or qualifications.
And this hasn't happened before? (generally speaking)
 
neutrino said:
Who isn't corrupt and/or delusional? Those with the power make her look like an amateur. Abdul Kalam used his position to the fullest and it is unfortunate that he won't be running for a second term.

That's true. There are people who are much much worse, like Arjun Singh. I'm very frustrated that they didn't consider a second term for Kalam.

And this hasn't happened before? (generally speaking)

Well, considering previous presidents, surely not to this extent? I mean, claiming to talk to dead people?
 
You're right. Its a disgrace that we allow our politicians to get away with the things they do. Its disgusting.

The only two people who I have any faith in our system are Manmohan Singh and Abdul Kalam. I actually met the guy for about 45 seconds on Gandhi Jayanti last year, but the guy looked so frail, it was almost a miracle he was standing. It would be sad if he didn't get re elected for that post.

All the quacks who get into our system and bleed it dry are killing the rest of us. The other day, I met a guy who's a noted authority on alternate energy resources and graduated from DCE. He's lived the last 14 years of his life hopping from one country to another and he told me that a lot of the Indians go abroad do so because the system F***S them over again and again, so they take the first chance they have to go abroad. Our own people arent valued here... it totally pisses me off!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
21K
  • · Replies 298 ·
10
Replies
298
Views
74K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 293 ·
10
Replies
293
Views
36K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K