Who's Hotter: Kirk or Picard?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Galteeth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poll
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the attractiveness of Captain Kirk and Captain Picard from Star Trek, focusing on character appeal rather than the actors themselves. Many participants express a preference for Kirk, citing his youthful charm and physical attractiveness, while others appreciate Picard for his intelligence and depth. The conversation touches on the characters' differing leadership styles, with Kirk seen as more adventurous and impulsive, while Picard is viewed as wise and thoughtful. Some participants also mention Spock as a favorite, highlighting his unique appeal due to his intelligence and emotional restraint. The debate includes comparisons of the characters at similar ages and critiques of their personalities, with some arguing that Picard's intellectualism may come off as arrogance. Ultimately, the discussion reflects a mix of nostalgia and personal preference, showcasing the enduring impact of these iconic characters on fans.

Who's hotter, Kirk or Picard

  • Kirk

    Votes: 16 37.2%
  • Picard

    Votes: 27 62.8%

  • Total voters
    43
  • #31
Kajahtava said:
... Exactly. He just tries to make a show of his knowledge, which is often of dubious quality anyway.

I wholeheartedly disagree. :biggrin:

One of Captain Picard's most admirable traits is his humility. Rarely, if ever, does one see him display knowledge for the sake of receiving praise or admiration. When Picard chooses to contribute to a conversation or situation, it is from a place of genuine interest for the integrity and well being of the ship and its crew.

Other cases, like when the Enterprise has visitors, he communicates a knowledge of the visitors' cultures and their traditions because he has a genuine interest in them as sentient beings and wants to make them feel welcome aboard the ship. It shows respect for their culture and values, not selfish pride.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Dembadon said:
I wholeheartedly disagree. :biggrin:

One of Captain Picard's most admirable traits is his humility. Rarely, if ever, does one see him display knowledge for the sake of receiving praise or admiration. When Picard chooses to contribute to a conversation or situation, it is from a place of genuine interest for the integrity and well being of the ship and its crew.

Other cases, like when the Enterprise has visitors, he communicates a knowledge of the visitors' cultures and their traditions because he has a genuine interest in them as sentient beings and wants to make them feel welcome aboard the ship. It showed a respect for their culture and values, not selfish pride.
Absolutely, well said. :approve:
 
  • #33
Dembadon said:
I wholeheartedly disagree. :biggrin:

One of Captain Picard's most admirable traits is his humility. Rarely, if ever, does one see him display knowledge for the sake of receiving praise or admiration. When Picard chooses to contribute to a conversation or situation, it is from a place of genuine interest for the integrity and well being of the ship and its crew.
You know that it's part of the official character description and envisioned by Gene Roddenberry that his one flaw is his arrogance and being too assured of himself right?

It's a common theme too in TNG episodes and films that they almost die because he overestimated himself and humanity's capabilities, especially with Q, the Borg, or a combination of both involved.

Other cases, like when the Enterprise has visitors, he communicates a knowledge of the visitors' cultures and their traditions because he has a genuine interest in them as sentient beings and wants to make them feel welcome aboard the ship. It shows respect for their culture and values, not selfish pride.
You might be caught in the so-called 'narcissist web', 'self-confidence', and 'narcissism' is the same thing depending if you like a person or not, people for some reason find people that are self-absorbed 'charming', this of course has all its obvious evolutionary reasons, if your children are self-absorbed they will obviously have a higher chance of survival.

Now, the true nigh infallible character on the show was Odo, until they ruined it in that one episode with that neural link. But they should've kept him infallible, because he was infallible without people noticing it because he wasn't 'charming', he wasn't out to court people with his words, he didn't tell people what they wanted to hear, he told them the harsh truth, and as such he's a difficult man to like. He had no praetence, no faked modesty, from this episode:

"It's like stepping on ants, Odo!"
"I don't step on ants, Major."
- Kira and Odo, discussing destroying the small protouniverse

If you think about it, of course Odo doesn't step on ant, it perfectly fits his character to not do so, but did he ever mention it before this? Does he make a show about it? No, Picard would announce his intentions to sacrifice himself for the crew with a pompous flamboyance, Odo wouldn't tell any-one, sneak away and do it, not being interested in their admiration. He wasn't about words, but about actions.

Of course, until his love for Kira started to be a theme, it was shown to be his one weakness, his one breaking of his principles. But before that, it showed the very realistic situation that the girl doesn't fall for the guy who's there for her, is honest, and doesn't lie, the girl falls for the guy who tells her what she wants to hear, likewise for 'friendship', Odo isn't a popular guy I can imagine, because he tells the harsh truth, he doesn't tell people what they want to hear, unlike Picard.
 
  • #34
Odo was my other favourite DS9 character. Funny that Garak seemed to have more respect for Odo than he did anyone else. They're rather a pair; the stoic and the conniver. Garak replaced Quark as a proper compliment.
 
  • #35
TheStatutoryApe said:
Odo was my other favourite DS9 character. Funny that Garak seemed to have more respect for Odo than he did anyone else. They're rather a pair; the stoic and the conniver. Garak replaced Quark as a proper compliment.
I thought "The Die is Cast" was a good episode.

I also think a lot of criticism Odo had towards the Federation was well founded, but I don't really approve of his living outside of the rules, I don't like 'Dirty Harry' style policing. I didn't really like TNG's anthropocentric narcissism too, the typical 'Ohh, humans are good, other species are all evil.' repetitive, Gene kind of demanded it. DS9 was more realistic and showed that politics in practice is far from idealised politics in theory.

I also love the transition of Damar's character, because he didn't change at all, he was just put in a different situation, it was the same character, DS9's realistic portrayal of nuanced multidimensional 'bad guys' who really show that the 'bad guy' is just a 'good guy' on the other side of the fence enabled them to believably make him switch sides as soon as the Dominion's cause seemed hopeless.
 
  • #36
Kajahtava said:
You know that it's part of the official character description and envisioned by Gene Roddenberry that his one flaw is his arrogance and being too assured of himself right?
Do you have a source for this? I can't find anything mentioning "arrogance" or "being too assured of himself."

Kajahtava said:
It's a common theme too in TNG episodes and films that they almost die because he overestimated himself and humanity's capabilities, especially with Q, the Borg, or a combination of both involved.
First of all, one is not given choices when dealing with Q. Q does as he pleases; you should know that.

The crew faces life-threatening situations due to the nature of their missions, which are commonly received from Starfleet Headquarters or distress signals while in an area. Picard's decisions within those missions are consistently selfless. I think your correlation is misguided.

Kajahtava said:
You might be caught in the so-called 'narcissist web', 'self-confidence', and 'narcissism' is the same thing depending if you like a person or not, people for some reason find people that are self-absorbed 'charming', this of course has all its obvious evolutionary reasons, if your children are self-absorbed they will obviously have a higher chance of survival.
Using your logic, I could just as easily claim that your judgment is misted by your dislike for him. This is where we'll just have to agree to disagree, because the "You're just not perceiving him correctly" stance isn't very stable, for either of us.
 
  • #37
Kajahtava said:
You know that it's part of the official character description and envisioned by Gene Roddenberry that his one flaw is his arrogance and being too assured of himself right?

It's a common theme too in TNG episodes and films that they almost die because he overestimated himself and humanity's capabilities, especially with Q, the Borg, or a combination of both involved.

You might be caught in the so-called 'narcissist web', 'self-confidence', and 'narcissism' is the same thing depending if you like a person or not, people for some reason find people that are self-absorbed 'charming', this of course has all its obvious evolutionary reasons, if your children are self-absorbed they will obviously have a higher chance of survival.

Now, the true nigh infallible character on the show was Odo, until they ruined it in that one episode with that neural link. But they should've kept him infallible, because he was infallible without people noticing it because he wasn't 'charming', he wasn't out to court people with his words, he didn't tell people what they wanted to hear, he told them the harsh truth, and as such he's a difficult man to like. He had no praetence, no faked modesty, from this episode:

"It's like stepping on ants, Odo!"
"I don't step on ants, Major."
- Kira and Odo, discussing destroying the small protouniverse

If you think about it, of course Odo doesn't step on ant, it perfectly fits his character to not do so, but did he ever mention it before this? Does he make a show about it? No, Picard would announce his intentions to sacrifice himself for the crew with a pompous flamboyance, Odo wouldn't tell any-one, sneak away and do it, not being interested in their admiration. He wasn't about words, but about actions.

Of course, until his love for Kira started to be a theme, it was shown to be his one weakness, his one breaking of his principles. But before that, it showed the very realistic situation that the girl doesn't fall for the guy who's there for her, is honest, and doesn't lie, the girl falls for the guy who tells her what she wants to hear, likewise for 'friendship', Odo isn't a popular guy I can imagine, because he tells the harsh truth, he doesn't tell people what they want to hear, unlike Picard.

Odo wasn't really a "guy" at all. Picard was no way as irritatingly overconfident as Janeway. But Voyager was just terrible all together.
 
  • #38
Galteeth said:
Odo wasn't really a "guy" at all. Picard was no way as irritatingly overconfident as Janeway. But Voyager was just terrible all together.
I can not think of anyone on Voyager that I really liked at all aside from the doctor. Not that I think he was very sexy or anything...
 
  • #39
Dembadon said:
Do you have a source for this? I can't find anything mentioning "arrogance" or "being too assured of himself."
Well, I did a Google search and a lot of profile pages list him as 'some-what arrogant', but no links to the original character description which admittedly is no-where to be found.

http://www.google.com/searchq=jean+luc+picard+character+description+arrogant


First of all, one is not given choices when dealing with Q. Q does as he pleases; you should know that.
And Janeway handled Q with a lot more caution.

I mean, an omnipotent and omniscient being comes to you saying 'You're not yet ready to explore the galaxy.' and he says back 'I think we are.' how bloody arrogant is that? You're talking to a being that can do all, and has seen all.

Encounter at Farpoint was a really bad episode, because Q had all the arguments, he had all the quotations from human history, Q was simply right and the crew of the Enterprise were savages that got aggressive because they couldn't handle being confronted with themselves, they had no argument back except some dogmatic gibberish saying 'you're wrong'.

But then again, Gene himself was pretty narcissistic about human capabilities, he gave technological progress and human morality a lot more credit than it deserved. After his death Star Trek became less anthropocentric and more realistic in showing that humanity isn't the perpetual good guy and the practice of the Federation is different than its idealized theory.

TNG was an extension of human narcissism. It tells people what they want to hear about themselves, that humanity will be the centre and focal point of some vast moral police of the galaxy that cannot fail. Later series were less flattening and consequently less popular.

The crew faces life-threatening situations due to the nature of their missions, which are commonly received from Starfleet Headquarters or distress signals while in an area. Picard's decisions within those missions are consistently selfless. I think your correlation is misguided.
So was Janeway's or Kirk's? They're larger than life characters. We're not debating if they're selfish or not, we're debating if Picard was arrogant or not, a little bit too in love with himself, a little bit too overconfident.

And there were a lot of episodes and a film which dealt with this theme, Picard's pride and arrogance.

Using your logic, I could just as easily claim that your judgment is misted by your dislike for him. This is where we'll just have to agree to disagree, because the "You're just not perceiving him correctly" stance isn't very stable, for either of us.
Oh, I'm perfectly willing to admit that Janeway wasn't arrogant even though I don't like her as a character. I love Dukat as a character and I can say without a trace of irony that he's arrogant as ****. I also love Bashir both as a character and as a person, but he's arrogant, come on, a central theme around Bashir was learning to cope with the fact that he could fail. The Quickening was one of my favourite episode, a central theme to it was Bashir's failing.

A lot of things simply went wrong, or almost went wrong, and wouldn't have gone wrong if Picard hadn't overestimate his or the Federation's capabilities, it's not really a thing you can say about ever-cautious Janeway or even worse, Garak.

Galteeth said:
Odo wasn't really a "guy" at all. Picard was no way as irritatingly overconfident as Janeway. But Voyager was just terrible all together.
Name me one example where **** went wrong because Janeway underestimated the situation or overestimated her of the Federation's capabilities?

The point is that Janeway was so flawless it got annoying, Picard still made some obvious mistakes, but Janeway didn't, she outwitted the Borg multiple times for ****s sake, it just wasn't believable any more. But yeah, purely in-universe, she was flawless, her command decisions were impeccable, she always took due praecautions, she was cautious, made flawless decisions and always had an ace up her sleeve, always another card when it turned out she was betrayed she was 'HAH, you think you had me, but this is Kathryn Janeway you're dealing with, I never take my chances so I had a backup plan!'

She was just too infallible for it to be realistic, she never made a single error in judgement.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40
Seriously people, Picard?

insp_captkirk_preview.jpg
 
  • #41
I was watching the Wrath of Khan and something occurred to me when Ricardo Montalban sheds his cloak to reveal exploding, shaved cleavage framed by a low-cut shirt: i.e. Star Trek is designed to appeal to masculine self-images more than female heterosexual interest. It's not about who is sexier to women, but which self-image of masculinity is more appealing to which viewer at which moment. I think an argument could be made that all the characters in TOS are the many sides of Gene Rodenberry's personality, or at least the main ones (Kirk, Spock, and McCoy). Kirk = passion and arrogance (male sexuality), Spock = logic and service-ethic (honorable soldier), and McCoy is the cynic, traditionalist, humanist, etc.

Maybe Picard could appeal to older men's self-image as being a dominant CEO. He has Riker and Wharf to flex muscle for him, Troy to be empathic and emotional, and Data ? I think the Picard character might have appealed to ST viewers who had outgrown their cowboy sexual self-image that appealed to them with Kirk, but deep inside I think every man holds onto that cowboy arrogance even when cultural criticism stimulates them to repress it.
 
  • #42
One of Captain Picard's most admirable traits is his humility
Presumably that's why the character is French, rather than played with Patrick Stewart's own Yorkshire accent.

Now a Yorkshire captain would be interesting !
 
  • #43
mgb_phys said:
Presumably that's why the character is French, rather than played with Patrick Stewart's own Yorkshire accent.

Now a Yorkshire captain would be interesting !

I think Picard was French because French philosophy was a dominant force of intrigue in science and academia in the 80s and 90s. Just a hunch.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K