Why Are All Planets in the Same Plane?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the arrangement of planets in a single plane within our solar system, exploring the reasons behind this phenomenon and the possibility of other solar systems exhibiting different orbital planes. Participants examine the implications of angular momentum conservation during planetary formation and the dynamics of celestial bodies in varying orbital configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that while planets are close to the same plane, they are not perfectly aligned, with Mercury having the largest inclination of about 7 degrees.
  • One explanation for the planar arrangement is the formation process of the solar system, where a nebula flattens into a disk due to the conservation of angular momentum as particles coalesce into a sun and planets.
  • Another participant suggests that while a disk formation is typical, it may be possible for a system to capture a larger body outside the plane, although this would likely be unstable.
  • It is mentioned that objects in the Oort Cloud orbit the Sun at random angles, indicating that not all celestial bodies conform to the same planar arrangement.
  • One participant questions whether drastically different orbital radii could exist in separate planes without causing collisions and whether such a configuration would still lead to flattening.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the dynamics of objects at high latitudes in a rotating cloud, suggesting they may either be drawn into the disk or fall into the Sun.
  • There is a discussion about the potential destabilizing effects of mutual attraction between planets with similar orbital radii, even if they do not collide.
  • A simulation of solar system formation is referenced, providing a visual representation of the discussed concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the formation and stability of planetary orbits, with no consensus reached on the possibility of solar systems with intersecting planes or the dynamics of bodies at different orbital radii.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the dynamics of celestial bodies, particularly regarding the effects of orbital inclination and the stability of different configurations, without resolving these complexities.

aetherguy881
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I've been wondering why in our solar system, all of the planets are in a single plane rotating around the sun. Why are there no intersecting planes? Also, would there be any solar systems with such planes?

I'm not asking for any minor angles. For example, I'm asking if there's any solar systems that have a planar axis such that they would intersect at ~30-90 degrees.

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Good question.
First i should point out that all of the planets are only close to the same plane. Usually we define a reference frame defined by the orbit of the earth, then refer to the angle of other planets' orbits relative to that. For instance mercury (with the largest angle of inclination) is about 7 degrees off (i think).

Anyway, as you suggested those are very minor angles.
The reason they are all so close to planar is due to their formation. When a nebula (collection of tiny tiny tiny particles) starts to coalesce into a planetary system - a nucleus has to form that becomes the sun. As particles "accrete" together, increasing the mass, a lot of angular momentum has to be conserved (think of spinning on a swing and pulling your legs in - you speed up), so the whole system starts to spin and flatten out into a disk. Once you have the disk, the center keeps increasing in mass, and smaller bodies start to form further out (which become planets). And that's the in-a-nutshell story of our creation, and why we're so close to a plane.

You can't have an accreting sphere (as apposed to disk), because the rotating particles in different planes will collide and flatten into a disk again - so planets can't form drastically out of the plane.
But it should by possible for a system to capture a larger body out of the plane. If this happened it wouldn't be stable for very long however... so overall the chances of seeing something like this are very slim in a single sun system.

In binary and trinary systems, some much more complex dynamics can come into play... maybe its possible there? (i think it would still be rare)
 
It is also worth noting that Oort Cloud objects (otuside the orbits of Neptune and Mercury) appear to orbit the Sun at fairly random angles.
 
So even with a drastically different orbit radius it would still flatten out?

Say the orbit of Mercury vs, the orbit of orbit of Neptune? What if orbits that different in size were in separate planes. There would be no way that they could collide. Would it still flatten?

Thanks for answering the initial question.
 
I think the previous explanation glosses over one issue a little. If the cloud is rotating about a single axis, but evenly distributed (say, in a uniform sphere), objects near the poles are not in orbit around the center of the cloud, just like the circle New York traces around the Earth as it rotates doesn't go around the center of the earth. So an object at high latitude in our rotating cloud has to either be "swept-up" by the disk or it would fall into the sun. I've never seen a computer simulation of this, but there is probably a latitude above which all objects fall into the sun and below which get pulled into the disk.
 
aetherguy881 said:
So even with a drastically different orbit radius it would still flatten out?

Say the orbit of Mercury vs, the orbit of orbit of Neptune? What if orbits that different in size were in separate planes. There would be no way that they could collide. Would it still flatten?

Thanks for answering the initial question.

The collision and flattening process happens way before the planets have formed, when it's all dust or smaller particles.
 
Redbelly has answered why they wouldn't form that way.

But drastically different orbital radii would be required for the situation to arise another way (how i have no idea - it may not be possible).
If the radii were similar, even if the bodies didn't physically collide - their mutual attraction would (i think) certainly destabilize the orbits.

Another thing i just thought of: although the effect of individual planets on the sun is almost negligible, they do have slight effects - the sun actually orbits a point within its own radius.
say for instance that mercury orbits at a right angle to mars' orbit - and there are no other planets. The 2 always perpendicular forces on the sun could very possibly develop resonant effects -> magnifying and instabilities... another reason this would be hard to occur.
 
Ok I guess that answers my questions guy, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K