Why are antiaromatic compounds less stable than aromatic compounds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter avistein
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Antiaromatic compounds exhibit less stability than aromatic compounds due to the nature of π electron delocalization. While delocalization in aromatic compounds leads to significant stabilization, in antiaromatic compounds, the stabilization is insufficient compared to the destabilizing effects of geometric deformations. The sigma system plays a crucial role in determining stability, indicating that the energetic stabilization from π electron delocalization does not translate to geometric stability. For a deeper understanding, literature such as the article from Wiley Online Library provides extensive insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aromatic and antiaromatic compounds
  • Knowledge of π and σ electron systems
  • Familiarity with molecular geometry and bond lengths
  • Basic principles of chemical stability and reactivity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of σ bonds in molecular stability
  • Explore the concept of geometric vs. energetic stability in organic compounds
  • Study the differences between aromatic, antiaromatic, and non-aromatic compounds
  • Read the article on Wiley Online Library regarding π electron delocalization
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and researchers interested in molecular stability and the properties of aromatic and antiaromatic compounds.

avistein
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
In aromatic compounds ,it is stabled because \pi electrons are delocalised.But why in antiaromatic compounds delocalisation of \pi electrons destablizes the compound and make it less stable than the corresponding single chain compound also. Should not the delocalisation have stabled it?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Delocalization also stabilizes anti-aromatic compounds, however, the statilization is not as large as in aromatic compounds. You also have to take in mind not only the absolute stability but also the stability relative to deformations leading away from equal bond lengths. For this, what is most relevant is the sigma system, not only the pi system.
There exists voluminous literature on that topic, a nice read is e.g.:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.20470/full
 
DrDu said:
. For this, what is most relevant is the sigma system, not only the pi system.

That means delocalisation of \pi electrons in sigma system does not stablize the system?
 
It does stabilize the system energetically but not necessarily geometrically.
 

Similar threads

Stability of aromatic compounds
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Why Do Atoms Need to Have Free Electrons to Create Covalent Bonds?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Hybridization of carbanion in rings
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
How Does Conjugation Lower Energy and Increase Stability in Aromatic Compounds?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Azulene - an interesting blue organic compound
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Radioactivity and the Periodic Table
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Aromaticity of 1-methyl-1H-pyridin-2-one?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Electronic transition in organic compounds
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Why are some d-electron configurations more stable? (1st row)
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Stability of tropylium cation vs triphenyl methyl cation
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K