Why Are Burnup Numbers Identical for Different Fuels in MCNP?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the identical burnup numbers obtained for three different fuels (LEU, LEU+, and thorium-based) in the MCNP simulation software. Participants clarify that burnup is an input parameter, typically defined as energy per mass of heavy metal, which explains the uniformity in results despite differing fuel compositions. Key factors affecting burnup calculations include isotopic distribution and k-effective values, which should vary across different fuels. The importance of the BURN card for specifying power levels and burn duration is also highlighted, particularly in relation to reactor criticality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code) simulation software
  • Knowledge of nuclear fuel types, specifically Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) and thorium-based fuels
  • Familiarity with burnup calculations and their significance in nuclear engineering
  • Basic concepts of isotopic distribution and k-effective in reactor physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the use of the BURN card in MCNP for accurate burnup simulations
  • Learn about isotopic distribution calculations in MCNP
  • Research the implications of k-effective values on reactor performance
  • Explore the differences in fuel behavior between LEU, LEU+, and thorium-based fuels
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, reactor physicists, and researchers involved in fuel cycle analysis and burnup calculations will benefit from this discussion.

Rafimah
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Different fuels are giving the same burnup in MCNP
Hi everyone,

I'm trying to compare 3 different fuels and MCNP and I want to recover the burnup of each. When I do that however, I get identical numbers for burnup, which doesn't make sense to me, as they have different materials (LEU vs LEU+ vs a thorium-based fuel).

Does anyone know what could be the issue here? My understanding is that burnup is the energy reduced per unit mass of isotopes >=90, so it should be pretty different for these 3 cases. I uploaded the 3 out files.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi @Rafimah , I can't see the out files.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rpp
I don't see your output files, but I think you have a conceptualization problem. For burnup calculations, ther burnup is an input (usually specified as energy per mass of heavy metal), and the code will calculate the isotopic distribution and k-effective.

It sounds like you ran three cases and received the same burnup. Not surprising, since this is an input. Look at the isotopics and k-effective, and they should be different.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alex A
There is a BURN card in the other thread specified as a power level and number of days to burn for but the reactor isn't finished and has a k of around 0.01, it's actually so under critical the code won't run. I think comparing fuels with BURN is valid, but if the conversion ratio is low any fuel is just going to yield the strictly theoretical amount of time and energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rpp

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
524
Replies
2
Views
835
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
13K