Why are Firefox programmers making it a memory eater?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Firefox Memory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the memory usage of the Firefox web browser, with participants expressing frustrations and experiences related to its performance. The scope includes user experiences, technical explanations, and comparisons with other browsers, as well as some humor and sarcasm regarding the issue.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports that Firefox is using 600MB of memory while running multiple tabs, expressing frustration at the perceived excessive memory consumption.
  • Another participant suggests that the high memory usage may be due to watching HD movie clips.
  • Some participants agree that Firefox crashes frequently, leading to further dissatisfaction.
  • Questions are raised about the temporary stash settings and the number of add-ons installed, with one participant expressing confusion about how to manage these settings.
  • One user mentions disabling non-essential add-ons and wonders if the memory issue is widespread or specific to their setup.
  • Several participants recommend trying Google Chrome for its lower memory overhead and faster performance.
  • Another participant argues that Firefox's memory usage is a feature designed to enhance browsing speed, especially on modern computers with ample RAM.
  • One user shares their experience of creating a new Firefox profile to reduce memory usage, noting that it helped keep memory consumption below 500MB.
  • There is a humorous exchange regarding the meaning of "crash," with some participants using sarcasm to address the issue.
  • Some participants express a preference for alternative browsers like Opera or Links due to their lower memory usage.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express dissatisfaction with Firefox's memory usage and frequent crashes, but there is no consensus on the reasons behind these issues or the best solutions. Multiple competing views on browser preferences and performance remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could influence memory usage, such as the number of open tabs, add-ons, and cache settings, but do not resolve the underlying causes of the memory consumption or crashes.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,109
Reaction score
20
My LORDY LORD, I'm running firefox right now with Gmail up, facebook, and a random website up. On facebook I am playing one of the stupid flash 10 games. I go to check my task manager and firefox.exe is taking up 600MB OF MEMORY! Seriously? I even check out process explorer and yes, 600MB.

Have all the idiotic programmers in the world seen that memory prices have gone down substantially over the last few years and decided that they must make sure their programs take up as much memory as humanly possible? This is unbelievable! I have actual PC games that take up less memory while in use! IMA BOUT TO SLAP A FOOL!

PENGWUINO EAT PROGRAMMERS![/size]

oh yah... uhm... I guess I don't really hvave a question... just venting...

Wait i have a question, where do I find where these programmers live?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Pengwuino said:
...a random website up...

Random hey? That what you call 'em? :wink:

Maybe it's watching movie clips in HD that does it :biggrin:
 
phyzmatix said:
Random hey? That what you call 'em? :wink:

Maybe it's watching movie clips in HD that does it :biggrin:

"No, baby, it's spyware, I didn't want to see that hotter younger version of you take her clothes off".
 
I got to agree firefox just eats the memory and causes lots of trouble. the current problem i am facing with firefox is it crashes very often.
 
What is your temporary stash set to? How many add-ons are installed?
 
I never used Firefox because even after the first time it was evident that it was no good.

People just started using them because of some trend and people want to be "different".

America founder of pseudo-individualism.

Anyways, are you still using it now?
 
Pattonias said:
What is your temporary stash set to? How many add-ons are installed?

I have no idea, what is it and how can I control it? :)

I disabled all the add-ons that didnt seem crucial. I left stuff like AVG's part of it, java crap, flash crap, etc, but turned off all the nice little addons like download helpers and such. Anything that seemed necessary to actually run content I might normally run across was left on. I'm amazed that other people have this problem and i tisnt just some massive memory leak on my computer (read as : not amazed at all)
 
Try Google Chrome. Very low overhead, comes up fast, and unlike IE or FF, it doesn't keep booting me out of PF chat. It's pretty bare-bones, as browsers go.
 
JasonRox said:
I never used Firefox because even after the first time it was evident that it was no good.

People just started using them because of some trend and people want to be "different".

America founder of pseudo-individualism.

Anyways, are you still using it now?

:rolleyes: I use it because I like it. To a non-computer geek, the choices are usually between the browsers we have heard of. This leaves IE or FF and to me, clearly FF is superior (at least in comparison too whatever edition of IE we have at work).


But now that you mention it, are lots of people using it? 'Cause if so, I need to switch to something less popular 'cause I'm like a non-conformist and stuff...

:-p
 
  • #10
To check if it is a memory leak, you can restart the computer and then restart firefox. If firefox is not using the same amount of memory that it used doing the same things as before then it could possibly be a memory leak.

To check for spy-ware you can use spy-bot (http://www.safer-networking.org/index2.html" ) it is free and very reliable. Once you download it let it scan your system. It will tell you what, if any, spy-ware you have and allow you to remove it.

If none of this works, let me know and I can tell you how to check your internet cache and see if that is the problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Firefox by default caches the last 8 pages for each tab bar you have open, and it pretty much never releases memory that it has grabbed for this. Apparently this isn't a bug it's a 'feature'.

The argument is that most users aren't using the memory for anything else anyway, if your new home computer has 4Gb of Ram and you are only browsing the web - why not speed up the browsing by using as much ram as possible. when you start another program the Firefox cache will be swapped out to disk anyway.

If you use your computer for real work just restart firefox to clear it's memory, or there are a bunch of complex tweaks you can do see http://www.thinktechno.com/2007/10/...on-how-to-reduce-the-memory-usage-in-firefox/

Or you could just use Opera like all us cool kids ;-)
 
  • #12
Opera for windows and firefox for linux. :)
 
  • #13
I think Firefox is great. Granted it is a memory hog, but then again, I am not of the ADD generation that has to have 15 tabs going with my 3D shooter game, i-tunes and movie player all going at the same time. Also, I can count the number of times FF has crashed on me on one hand and those were due to pages with heavy scripts written for IE. Once I restarted and opened them in an IE window in FF (a very cool add on by the way) there were no issues.

With all of the customizations and flexibility Firefox gives you, I'll take the memory suck up any day over using IE or the like. I still have to try Chrome or Opera though.
 
  • #14
What's this "crash" people talk about? do your computers fall over?
 
  • #15
turbo-1 said:
Try Google Chrome. Very low overhead, comes up fast, and unlike IE or FF, it doesn't keep booting me out of PF chat. It's pretty bare-bones, as browsers go.
Yeah. So was [strike]Netsc[/strike] ... er ... Firefox when it first started. Until it realized that mere goodwill and warm fuzzies from its loyal following weren't going to keep it competitive...
 
  • #16
mgb_phys said:
... Or you could just use Opera like all us cool kids ;-)

I prefer Links. :smile:
 
  • #17
Firefox tends to keep a lot of memory cache, so the more tabs you have open and the more history of the current session, the more memory it eats. A couple of things that help are tweaking firefox's settings (pretty much their equivalent of the registry) or creating a new profile (I had to do that because on my old profile, which I have used for many years on many different re-installations of windows, the memory usage would often top 1GB, and even with tweaking, there was nothing I could do). Now Firefox uses less than 500MB most all the time.
 
  • #18
Chi Meson said:
What's this "crash" people talk about? do your computers fall over?

Crash means all of a sudden you will get an error report saying firefox has encountered an problem and needs to close. if you in the middle of some work you can even have time to bookmark it or you cannot proceed further unless you give ok for that crash report pop up and the firefox will close. we have to start another firefox browser to do our work.

does anyone else have encountered similar problem?
how did you rectify it?
 
  • #19
Chi Meson said:
What's this "crash" people talk about? do your computers fall over?

martharon said:
Crash means all of a sudden you will get an error report saying firefox has encountered an problem and needs to close.
Main Entry: sar·casm
Pronunciation: \ˈsär-ˌka-zəm\
Function: noun
Etymology: French or Late Latin; French sarcasme, from Late Latin sarcasmos, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, from sark-, sarx flesh; probably akin to Avestan thwarəs- to cut
Date: 1550

1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b : the use or language of sarcasm
 
  • #20
Dembadon said:
I prefer Links. :smile:

Yes Lynx/Elinks uses very, (very, very) little memory. =)
 
  • #21
@Saladsamurai
Lol.. :-D (I don't like the grin smiley in PF. Should i convey my grievance in the feedbackforum? :biggrin:)
 
  • #22
FredGarvin said:
Main Entry: sar·casm
Pronunciation: \ˈsär-ˌka-zəm\
Function: noun
Etymology: French or Late Latin; French sarcasme, from Late Latin sarcasmos, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, from sark-, sarx flesh; probably akin to Avestan thwarəs- to cut
Date: 1550

1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b : the use or language of sarcasm
3: a knee-jerk reaction from Mac users when conversation drifts to topics of Windows problems.
 
  • #23
Chi Meson said:
3: a knee-jerk reaction from Mac users when conversation drifts to topics of Windows problems.

mac11crash.gif
 
  • #24
Updating you about 10 years, Pythagorean:
WaitCursor-300p.gif
 
  • #25
Mk said:
Updating you about 10 years, Pythagorean:
WaitCursor-300p.gif

This graphic doesn't always indicate a crash. I can count on one hand how many times a program has completely crashed in the past year of using Macs.

The following error is experienced by me and many co-workers on a (sometimes) weekly basis:
 

Attachments

  • windows error.jpg
    windows error.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 408
  • #26
Mk said:
Updating you about 10 years, Pythagorean:
WaitCursor-300p.gif

"The Spinning pizza cutter of DEATH!"

OK, it happens. Now and then. Occasionally. With MS applications mostly, and that's a "freeze," anyway, isn't it?
 
  • #27
Pythagorean said:
mac11crash.gif

I almost miss that one. A crash was never so cute!
 
  • #28
Dembadon said:
This graphic doesn't always indicate a crash. I can count on one hand how many times a program has completely crashed in the past year of using Macs.

The following error is experienced by me and many co-workers on a (sometimes) weekly basis:
In the past 20 years using Windows, numbers of crashes...ZERO.

I'm absolutely serious. But I don't download questionable crap on my home computer that might not work right. At work, everything is made to run on Windows, so no problems. So, it's not Windows, it's the poorly written apps that cause problems with other apps.
 
  • #29
Evo said:
In the past 20 years using Windows, numbers of crashes...ZERO.

I'm absolutely serious. But I don't download questionable crap on my home computer that might not work right. At work, everything is made to run on Windows, so no problems. So, it's not Windows, it's the poorly written apps that cause problems with other apps.

The error I posted happens when performing things as trivial as changing one's IP address or navigating 'Control Panel'.

I must say that I am quite envious of your Windows experience. :smile:
 
  • #30
I have used CP/M, DOS (all kinds!) Apple, Mac, Windows, etc, etc, and have been the IT specialist in a large medical practice in which DOS and Windows had to coexist on a Novell network (no mean feat!). All hardware and OS combinations have their strengths and weaknesses, including costs, compatibilities, available applications, etc.

The sniping (usually Mac vs MS) reminds me of guys with pickup trucks who buy window decals featuring a urinating cartoon brat. The only difference is in which TM decals are at the receiving end of the insult (Chevy, Ford, Dodge...). Sad.

Disclaimer: I am running XP SP3 on a Dell that is pushing 5 years old. It is protected with AVAST, and I never see a BSOD. The biggest hassle I have (maybe a couple of times a month) is that I have to shut down Chrome because some bogus alert will come up when visiting a web-site telling me that I need to have my system scanned. The "alerts" are designed such that ANY response results in mal-ware trying to install itself. As a musician, I often seek out tablature, lyrics, etc, and it seems that music fan-sites are frequently contaminated with hijack-software.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
6K