triabva2003
- 1
- 0
Why giant stars are so low in density?
Giant stars exhibit low average density due to the extensive burning of fuel and the bloating of their outer layers, resulting from a complex internal structure that differs from main-sequence stars. As they evolve, these stars undergo a series of fusion processes, transitioning from hydrogen to helium, and eventually to heavier elements like oxygen and carbon. The outer layers expand significantly due to the energy produced in the surrounding shells, leading to a giant radius. Ultimately, when fusion ceases in the core, the star sheds its outer layers, leaving behind a dense white dwarf core.
PREREQUISITESAstronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in the lifecycle of stars and the processes that lead to the formation of white dwarfs and other stellar remnants.
triabva2003 said:Why giant stars are so low in density?
It has nothing to do with less gravity. The core becomes super heated in ancient stars - which means more pressure on the outer layers. Stars are in a continuos state of hydrostatic equilibrium - until the core temperature becomes too hot or cool to remain in gravitational balance.Radrook said:By the time they become giants they have burnt up a lot of their fuel and their outer layers have bloated due to less gravity. It doesn't mean that their cores aren't very dense though. It just means their average density is lower than main sequence stars which are still fusing hydrogen and have enough gravity to keep their outer layers compact..
Chronos said:It has nothing to do with less gravity. The core becomes super heated in ancient stars - which means more pressure on the outer layers. Stars are in a continuos state of hydrostatic equilibrium - until the core temperature becomes too hot or cool to remain in gravitational balance.