Why are gluons considered to be elementary particles?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Gluons are classified as fundamental particles within the Standard Model, functioning as gauge bosons with spin-1. Unlike mesons, which are composite quark-antiquark pairs, gluons do not possess mass and are responsible for mediating the strong force between quarks. The discussion clarifies that while both gluons and mesons involve quark-antiquark configurations, their properties and roles in particle physics are distinct. Additionally, W bosons, despite being force carriers, are not mesons and have different characteristics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Familiarity with gauge bosons and their properties
  • Knowledge of quark-antiquark pairs and their interactions
  • Concept of color charge and color octet states in quantum chromodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of gauge bosons in the Standard Model
  • Explore quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and its implications for strong interactions
  • Investigate the differences between mesons and baryons in particle physics
  • Learn about the role of W and Z bosons in electroweak interactions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental forces and particles in the universe.

Sophrosyne
Messages
128
Reaction score
21
Gluons are often depicted as fundamental particles in the Standard Model. But in looking at their mechanism, it seems they are not really fundamental particles in the sense that they are fundamental, indivisible, building blocks. They are mesons- a composite quark-antiquark pair, where their spin adds up to zero and therefore they act as gauge bosons.

And speaking of that, it seems even the weak force, the W bosons, can also be depicted equivalently as mesons, can't they?

Am I misunderstanding this somehow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sophrosyne said:
They are mesons- a composite quark-antiquark pair
They are not. Mesons have mass, mesons are color-neutral, mesons have excited states, and various other properties that differ from gluons.
Sophrosyne said:
And speaking of that, it seems even the weak force, the W bosons, can also be depicted equivalently as mesons, can't they?
It cannot.
 
Sophrosyne said:
They are mesons- a composite quark-antiquark pair, where their spin adds up to zero and therefore they act as gauge bosons.
where did you get that information?
The Standard Model particles are the following:
Vector Bosons (Spin=1) : W/Z-bosons [W/Z], photons [γ], gluons [g]
Scalar Boson (Spin = 0) : Higgs [H]
Fermions (Spin=1/2):
__leptons don't interact via strong interactions:
electron (e), muon (μ), tau (τ) and the respective neutrinos (νe,μ,τ)
__quarks do interact via strong interactions:
up (u), down (d), charm (c), strange (s) , top (t) , bottom (b)
 
I see. I guess I was seeing the use of mesons as force carriers for the inter-hadron interactions, and I also saw that gluons carry color charge in eight different types even for the inter-quark interactions, represented by the "color octet" states. These are represented in a quark-antiquark representation, and thought that was the same thing as a meson. But that just seems to be the quantum state of the gluon, not a meson.
 
The quark-antiquark colour representation is a 9-dimensional representation (since it is the product of two 3-dimensional ones). It can be split into a colour singlet, which is the colourless trivial representation of mesons, and a colour octet - the same representation that the gluons transform according to.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K