High School Why are imaginary numbers called "imaginary"? If they really exist

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The term "imaginary numbers" was coined by René Descartes in 1637, reflecting the skepticism of mathematicians towards new concepts at the time. Imaginary numbers, represented as a subset of complex numbers in the form (0,b), are essential in various mathematical applications, despite their name suggesting otherwise. Their existence is validated in fields like Quantum Mechanics, where measurements yield real eigenvalues, while complex numbers serve as mathematical tools. The historical context of the term emphasizes the distinction between the imaginary nature of the name and the tangible applications of these numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation.
  • Familiarity with the mathematical operations involving complex numbers.
  • Knowledge of Quantum Mechanics and eigenvalues.
  • Historical context of mathematical terminology and its evolution.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical development of complex numbers and their applications.
  • Study Quantum Mechanics, focusing on Hermitian operators and their eigenvalues.
  • Explore the mathematical significance of imaginary numbers in polynomial equations.
  • Read Descartes' original works to understand his perspective on imaginary numbers.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, educators, and students interested in the historical and practical implications of imaginary numbers in mathematics and science.

SHASHWAT PRATAP SING
Messages
119
Reaction score
13
If Imaginary numbers do exist and have real applications, then why do we call imaginary numbers "imaginary numbers"? . They exist. They're used all the time. What makes them "imaginary"?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You're right! You can look at how Spivak defines complex numbers, as a pair ##(a,b)## along with the definitions ##(a,b) + (a,d) = (a+c, b+d)## and ##(a,b) \cdot (c,d) = (a\cdot c - b\cdot d, a\cdot d + b \cdot c)##. The ##x+iy## notation is recovered by setting ##i = (0,1)##, and ##(a,0) = a##. There's nothing very strange about this at all. And imaginary numbers are just a subset of ##\mathbb{C}##, of the form ##(0,b)##.

Historically, mathematicians have a tendency to be skeptical about new developments, hence why "imaginary" was introduced as a bit of a diss.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
If Imaginary numbers do exist and have real applications, then why do we call imaginary numbers "imaginary numbers"? . They exist. They're used all the time. What makes them "imaginary"?
The name originally was due to skepticism and has stuck. There is, however, an important distinction between real and complex/imaginary numbers in physics. Complex numbers tend to be part of the mathematical machinery, but measurements are always real numbers. You can measure an angle ##\theta##, but you can't do a measurement and get an imaginary angle ##i\theta##.

This is hard-wired into Quantum Mechanics, where measurements are the eigenvalues of Hermitian operators - and these operators always have real eigenvalues. There are other important operators in QM that have complex or imaginary eigenvalues, but these explicitly are not measurable quantities.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
If Imaginary numbers do exist and have real applications, then why do we call imaginary numbers "imaginary numbers"? . They exist. They're used all the time. What makes them "imaginary"?
Not what, whom! It was René Descartes 1637. The reason was very likely, that the complex zeros of polynomials, for which the imaginary numbers were first needed, couldn't be seen in their graphs.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker, berkeman and aheight
What i have understood is that imaginary numbers are called imaginary because Mathematicians thought up an answer to the square root of -1, and they simply "imagined" a solution. Later when it was found that Imaginary numbers really exist,The name was not changed beause the named sound impressive as by "IMAGINARY NUMBERS" it was left to us to imagine a solution to the square root of negative numbers aince we are imagining the number so it got its name "Imaginary Numbers".

Here comes an important point- IMAGINARY NUMBERS are Imaginary but their existence is not Imaginary they really exist. it was imaginary in the sense as it was left to the people's imagination to imagine a solution to the square root of negative numbers and use the letter i this was fancy and impressive.
So,IMAGINARY NUMBERS are Imaginary but their existence is not Imaginary.they are "imaginary" but not in the sense of fantasy or fiction.It is just the same word being used differently...

Please tell me have I understood it correctly...
 
You will need to explain what you mean when you say a "real" number "exists". I think this is fraught.
I prefer a more teleological approach: is the concept useful? Of course then one needs to define "useful"
 
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
Please tell me have I understood it correctly...
You did not. The correct version is in my post #4. Descartes used it 1637 for the first time. Mathematicians at this point in time were still busy to solve polynomial equations. Imaginary numbers occurred in the formulas of Italian mathematicians like Cardano, Tartaglia or Ferrari a century ago. Descartes, however, coined the name imaginary. If you want to know his thoughts, you have to dig up the original article, likely a letter.

It is not helpful to fantasize some speculative explanations if history is as clear as in this case.
 
fresh_42 said:
Descartes, however, coined the name imaginary.

My question is not how , its why did he coined the name Imaginary if these numbers really exists.Help me.

hutchphd said:
I prefer a more teleological approach: is the concept useful? Of course then one needs to define "useful
please help me i am confused i want to know why were these numbers called imaginary
 
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
My question is not how , its why did he coined the name Imaginary if these numbers really exists.Help me.
Look up Helmuth Gericke: Geschichte des Zahlbegriffs. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim 1970, p. 66. and the references therein.

Again, and for the third time: If you want to know why Descartes named it so, you will have to read the original occurrence.

The question has been answered. Speculations are meaningless, so this thread will be closed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourse_on_the_Method
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b86069594/f5.image
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes robphy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
942
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K