Why are linearly ordered R and R/{0} not isomophic?

  • #1
QuasarBoy543298
32
2
i saw a proof that said “in R/{0} , the set [-1,0) has an upper bound ,but no least upper bound. no such set exists in linearly ordered R” ,but i could not understand it.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
StoneTemplePython
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,254
597
so ##[-1,0]## is compact and using the identity function has a maximum at zero. If you delete the zero you lose compactness and there is no longer a maximum.
- - --

edit:
I think I misread this. The issue is that the Real Line with zero deleted doesn't have a smallest positive number for the same reason it doesn't have biggest (i.e. smallest magnitude) negative number. Any non-negative number is an upper bound of ##[-1,0)## but the issue is that if you have ##0## removed from the real line, you must use positive numbers and there isn't a smallest positive number hence no tight upper bound on negative numbers.

The point, I suppose is that ##\mathbb R## and ##\mathbb R /{0}## are both open sets but the former is connected while the latter is not
 
Last edited:

Suggested for: Why are linearly ordered R and R/{0} not isomophic?

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
867
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
6K
Top