Why are mosquitoes and bedbugs successful?

  • Thread starter Thread starter surajt88
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the evolutionary success of mosquitoes and bed bugs, particularly focusing on the role of the itching sensation caused by their bites. Participants explore why these insects have not evolved to be less irritating to humans, considering factors such as natural selection, evolutionary pressures, and the biological mechanisms involved in their feeding behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that mosquitoes and bed bugs that do not cause itching would have a significant advantage, as humans would be less likely to notice or swat them.
  • Others argue that mosquitoes are already successful in obtaining blood, and the itching occurs after they have begun feeding, suggesting that there may not be a strong evolutionary pressure to change.
  • One participant mentions that evolution can be "lazy" and does not always optimize for the best solution if the current state is sufficient for survival.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that the irritation caused by bites may actually benefit mosquitoes by bringing more blood to the surface, thus aiding their feeding.
  • Some participants highlight the anthropocentric perspective of the discussion, noting that mosquitoes can find alternative hosts even if humans take measures to repel them.
  • There is a mention of leeches as an example of a feeding mechanism that does not cause irritation, raising questions about the evolutionary pathways available to mosquitoes.
  • Several participants discuss the role of natural selection and the limitations of evolutionary change, emphasizing that mosquitoes cannot rapidly adapt to eliminate the irritant response.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on why mosquitoes and bed bugs have not evolved to be less irritating. Some agree on the effectiveness of current feeding strategies, while others challenge the assumptions about evolutionary pressures and advantages.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion involves complex biological and evolutionary concepts, with varying interpretations of the implications of irritation and feeding strategies. There are unresolved questions about the evolutionary landscape and the potential for mosquitoes to adapt in response to human behavior.

surajt88
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hi all. Mosquitoes and bed bugs that dint give us an itch after being bitten would have had an enormous advantage over normal mosquitoes and bed bugs as we wouldn't notice or bother if we dint feel anything. By natural selection, these types of bugs would have had an edge over current bugs. I've come to know that the itching sensation is due to the compounds the bugs inject to prevent blood clot while they suck. So, why don't we have irritation-less mosquitoes and bed bugs? Is it because there isn't a compound that both doesn't irritate us and prevents blood clot or hasn't there been enough time for them to evolve?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Many states jokingly call mosquitos their state bird. In my state, they come in such vast hordes that plenty of them get away, full of enough blood to spread progeny. For a sufficiently small crowd of mosquitos, many of us (not me, personally, I hate the bastards) just adapt to ignoring them. They also get us while we're sleeping.

Also, humans are extremely hygienic and picky, and have very exposed skin compared to most mammals; mammals like bulvines can also do little about mosquitos compared to humans. We aren't their only prey.

Evolution can be lazy to selection pressures. It doesn't have to perform at 110% if it's getting by with 10%. It's not a graduate student : )
 
because we are! :biggrin:
 
Pythagorean said:
Many states jokingly call mosquitos their state bird. In my state, they come in such vast hordes that plenty of them get away, full of enough blood to spread progeny. For a sufficiently small crowd of mosquitos, many of us (not me, personally, I hate the bastards) just adapt to ignoring them. They also get us while we're sleeping.

Also, humans are extremely hygienic and picky, and have very exposed skin compared to most mammals; mammals like bulvines can also do little about mosquitos compared to humans. We aren't their only prey.

Evolution can be lazy to selection pressures. It doesn't have to perform at 110% if it's getting by with 10%. It's not a graduate student : )
So the reason must be that its cheaper for mosquitoes to be as they are as we are not the only ones in their diet!
 
One might argue that it's not a cheaper solution; just there's not enough evolutionary pressure to "push the ball over the hump" so it can "settle into the lower state". As long as it's in a surviving state, it doesn't have to always be the cheapest state.
 
surajt88 said:
Hi all. Mosquitoes and bed bugs that dint give us an itch after being bitten would have had an enormous advantage over normal mosquitoes and bed bugs as we wouldn't notice or bother if we dint feel anything.
Your statement that there would be an enormous advantage is not correct, the mosquitoes are already successful in getting an animal's blood. At the point it starts itching the mosquito is already far underway in getting its meal.
 
Monique said:
Your statement that there would be an enormous advantage is not correct, the mosquitoes are already successful in getting an animal's blood. At the point it starts itching the mosquito is already far underway in getting its meal.
We normally use mosquito repellents and other means to kill them most often because their bite irritates us. If we did not feel anything, why kill them (unless in malaria prone areas)? So it seems to me that it is an advantage for them to go unnoticed.
 
That is a very anthropocentric point of view. One can place mosquito nets in a house or locally spray DEET, but then the mosquito can easily find another target. There are so many mosquitos that the few you repel really makes no difference on the population.
 
Monique said:
That is a very anthropocentric point of view. One can place mosquito nets in a house or locally spray DEET, but then the mosquito can easily find another target. There are so many mosquitos that the few you repel really makes no difference on the population.
Right. That's what I wanted to know.
 
  • #10
surajt88 said:
Hi all. Mosquitoes and bed bugs that dint give us an itch after being bitten would have had an enormous advantage over normal mosquitoes and bed bugs as we wouldn't notice or bother if we dint feel anything. By natural selection, these types of bugs would have had an edge over current bugs. I've come to know that the itching sensation is due to the compounds the bugs inject to prevent blood clot while they suck. So, why don't we have irritation-less mosquitoes and bed bugs? Is it because there isn't a compound that both doesn't irritate us and prevents blood clot or hasn't there been enough time for them to evolve?

why do you think that such kind of bugs should exist. Do you think mosquitoe bites are harmless , how would the body react to such a bite. you should realize that the chemical released initiates a reaction in our body which we perceive as itching.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insect_bites_and_stings
 
  • #11
Mosquitoes don't get a choice in the matter. The only natural selection that matters is that they can breed faster than we can swat them. We actually help them by leaving around items that collect stagnant water where a lot of them can breed. But even if we decided to eradicate everything that made us itch, they can't just suddenly develop a new way of feeding on demand. That's not how evolution works.
 
  • #12
Moonbear said:
But even if we decided to eradicate everything that made us itch, they can't just suddenly develop a new way of feeding on demand. That's not how evolution works.
No but what might happen is a mosquitoes might evolve that is slightly less itchy to us, allowing more of them to survive and breed. 'course this wouldn't likely happen unless humans comprised the lion's share of their diet.
 
  • #13
Moonbear said:
But even if we decided to eradicate everything that made us itch, they can't just suddenly develop a new way of feeding on demand. That's not how evolution works.

Was this referring to my post, if it is - i was not even talking about evolution. The OP was referring to itching which has less to do with evolution, than a simple chemical reaction that the body has to foreign substances. This occurs in variety of cases not just mosquito bites, also to to chemicals which we use daily.

Feeding is a different story, it can be achieved without producing the irritant substance (think leeches! ).They(Leeches) achieve by secreting a anticoagulant, can feed for days or months without even the host noticing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Monique said:
That is a very anthropocentric point of view. One can place mosquito nets in a house or locally spray DEET, but then the mosquito can easily find another target. There are so many mosquitos that the few you repel really makes no difference on the population.

Agree with the comment 'That is a very anthropocentric point of view.'
 
  • #15
My sister, a year or two ago, mentioned to me a theory she read about: mosquitos don't evolve to be less annoying because it helps their species overall. The action of slapping at mosquitos brings more blood to the surface area where they feed on animals, and so even if a few members of the population die from it, as a whole they feed better.
 
  • #16
thorium1010 said:
Feeding is a different story, it can be achieved without producing the irritant substance (think leeches! ).They(Leeches) achieve by secreting a anticoagulant, can feed for days or months without even the host noticing.
Actually mosquitoes also release an anticoagulant and as far as I'm aware leech bites itch after the fact too. The itching from a bite does not occur whilst one is being bitten but after and is due to an immune response against the secretions from the bite.

As for an evolutionary take on this first there is the question of if it would be a selective advantage as the mosquito has left before swelling and itching occurs. Also that the capability to evolve a means of evading the immune system may be nowhere near on the fitness landscape and may require many detrimental mutations before reaching that step therefore it is unlikely to occur.
 
  • #17
DaveC426913 said:
No but what might happen is a mosquitoes might evolve that is slightly less itchy to us, allowing more of them to survive and breed. 'course this wouldn't likely happen unless humans comprised the lion's share of their diet.

And unlikely to happen at all unless there are already hypoallergenic mosqitoes around. They can't just acquire a trait that isn't in their population.

As others have pointed out, the itch is after the fact anyway. By the time you're itching, the mosquito is long gone.
 
  • #18
As Moonie pointed out earlier, stagnant pools make it very easy for mosquitoes to breed, and humans are very slack about controlling this. Perhaps the worst offenders are people who dump old tires. Rain-water collects in the tires, and gives mosquitoes safe, protected places to breed with no predators. I have a pond in my backyard, and the first thing I did when we bought the place was to put a fish-trap in the stream down back and trap lots of dace (chubs) to stock the pond with. They are quite good at taking care of the mosquito larvae.

Off the "itching" topic, for sure, but relevant because the best way to fight the itch is not to get bitten, and I sure don't want to use chemicals to achieve that.
 
  • #19
turbo said:
As Moonie pointed out earlier, stagnant pools make it very easy for mosquitoes to breed, and humans are very slack about controlling this. Perhaps the worst offenders are people who dump old tires. Rain-water collects in the tires, and gives mosquitoes safe, protected places to breed with no predators. I have a pond in my backyard, and the first thing I did when we bought the place was to put a fish-trap in the stream down back and trap lots of dace (chubs) to stock the pond with. They are quite good at taking care of the mosquito larvae.
Yeah but how many chubs can you put in each tire? :-p
 
  • #20
DaveC426913 said:
Yeah but how many chubs can you put in each tire? :-p
If I find any more tires in the woods, maybe I'll throw them in the pond, and the chubs can take care of that themselves.
 
  • #21
Moonbear said:
And unlikely to happen at all unless there are already hypoallergenic mosqitoes around. They can't just acquire a trait that isn't in their population.
Presumably there is a certain amount of variation in any number of factors that affect itchiness. They might not even be chemical, they might be behavioral, such as some mosquitoes having a preference for landing on less sensitive parts of the body (based on some attractive factor beknownst only to them).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 287 ·
10
Replies
287
Views
28K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
9K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
40K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
7K
Replies
28
Views
8K