Why Are My Coupled Oscillator Eigenvalues Incorrect?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
Redwaves
Messages
134
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
What are the eigenvalue and eigenvectors
##m_a = m_b = m_c##
Relevant Equations
##\frac{d^2x_a}{dt^2} + \frac{2kx_a}{m} - \frac{kx_b}{m}##

##\frac{d^2x_b}{dt^2} + \frac{3kx_b}{m} - \frac{kx_a}{m} - 2\frac{kx_c}{m}##

##\frac{d^2x_c}{dt^2} + \frac{2kx_c}{m} - \frac{2kx_b}{m}##
Hi,
I have to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for a system of 3 masses and 4 springs. At the end I don't get the right eigenvalues, but honestly I don't know why. Everything seems fine for me. I spent the day to look where is my error, but I really don't know.
zOPIHiX.png

##m_a = m_b = m_c##

I got these motion equations

##\frac{d^2x_a}{dt^2} + \frac{2kx_a}{m} - \frac{kx_b}{m} = 0##

##\frac{d^2x_b}{dt^2} + \frac{3kx_b}{m} - \frac{kx_a}{m} - 2\frac{kx_c}{m} = 0##

##\frac{d^2x_c}{dt^2} + \frac{2kx_c}{m} - \frac{2kx_b}{m} = 0##

Then, after plugging the solution ##x(t) = X_{ni} cos(\omega_n + \alpha_n)##

I get this matrix

##\begin{pmatrix}
-\omega_n^2 +\frac{2k}{m} & -\frac{k}{m} & 0\\
- \frac{k}{m} & -\omega_n^2 +\frac{3k}{m} & -\frac{2k}{m} \\
0 & -\frac{2k}{m} &-\omega_n^2 +\frac{2k}{m}
\end{pmatrix}##

Next, I have to find that ##det(A)## = 0
##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{2k}{m})[(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2 -(\frac{2k}{m})^2 - (\frac{k}{m})^2 ] = 0##

thus,
I have ##\omega_1^2 = \frac{2k}{m}, \omega_2^2 = -\frac{k}{m}(-3 -\sqrt{5}), \omega_3^2 = -\frac{k}{m}(-3 +\sqrt{5})##

However the correct eigenvalues are
I have ##\omega_1^2 = \frac{2k}{m}, \omega_2^2 = \frac{5-\sqrt{21}}{2}\frac{k}{m}, \omega_3^2 = \frac{5+\sqrt{21}}{2}\frac{k}{m}##

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
haruspex said:
I don't see how you got that polynomial from expanding the determinant. In particular, how do you get a term
##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2##
?
I get the book answer, except I get 24s instead of 21s.
I agree that the ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2## term does not belong. However, the determinant I got gives the book's eigenvalues.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Redwaves
kuruman said:
I agree that the ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2## term does not belong. However, the determinant I got gives the book's eigenvalues.
My bad after checking for 100 times I see my error. I replaced ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2## with ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{2k}{m})^2##
I'm so frustrated I spent all day just for that.
Thanks guys
 
Redwaves said:
My bad after checking for 100 times I see my error. I replaced ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2## with ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{2k}{m})^2##
I'm so frustrated I spent all day just for that.
Thanks guys
I don't see how one gets ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{2k}{m})^2## out of this.

When I am faced with the eigenvalues of a matrix larger than 2×2, I try to find common factors in the characteristic equation before multiplying out any terms in parentheses. In this case, expanding the determinant along the top row gives $$\left(\frac{2 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)\left[\left(\frac{3 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)-\frac{4 k^2}{m^2}\right] +\frac{k}{m} \left[-\frac{k}{m}\left(\frac{2k}{m}-\omega_n^2\right)\right]=0.$$There is an obvious common factor ##\left(\frac{2 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)## which provides the first eigenvalue ##\omega_1^2=2k/m##. To find the other two eigenvalues, we assert that ##\omega_n^2\neq2k/m## and divide the equation by the common factor to get $$\left(\frac{3 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)-\frac{5 k^2}{m^2} =0.$$Solving the quadratic is trivial.
 
kuruman said:
I don't see how one gets ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{2k}{m})^2## out of this.

When I am faced with the eigenvalues of a matrix larger than 2×2, I try to find common factors in the characteristic equation before multiplying out any terms in parentheses. In this case, expanding the determinant along the top row gives $$\left(\frac{2 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)\left[\left(\frac{3 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)-\frac{4 k^2}{m^2}\right] +\frac{k}{m} \left[-\frac{k}{m}\left(\frac{2k}{m}-\omega_n^2\right)\right]=0.$$There is an obvious common factor ##\left(\frac{2 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)## which provides the first eigenvalue ##\omega_1^2=2k/m##. To find the other two eigenvalues, we assert that ##\omega_n^2\neq2k/m## and divide the equation by the common factor to get $$\left(\frac{3 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)-\frac{5 k^2}{m^2} =0.$$Solving the quadratic is trivial.
I meant, in the matrix at position 2ij, I replaced 2k/m with 3k/m in the determinant formula.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman