Why are my problems written as sub x and sub 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter hominid
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical representation of population dynamics using life tables, specifically the notation "sub x" for variables such as L sub x (survivorship) and m sub x (fecundity). The equation R_0 = ∑(L_x m_x) illustrates the population replacement rate, which can vary based on the values of L_x and m_x across different age groups. The confusion arises from the interpretation of R_0 as a constant versus a variable, with the consensus that R_0 is not constant but rather a function of the summation over the specified age range, x_first to x_last.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of life tables and population dynamics
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation, particularly summation notation
  • Knowledge of demographic concepts such as survivorship and fecundity
  • Basic grasp of population growth models
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of R_0 in population ecology
  • Learn about the construction and interpretation of life tables
  • Explore the relationship between L_x and m_x in demographic modeling
  • Investigate how variations in R_0 affect population growth rates
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in ecology, demography, and population biology who are analyzing population dynamics and life table methodologies.

hominid
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Why are my problems written as "sub x" and "sub 0"

Homework Statement




I am doing population tables in math where x represents age. L sub x represents survivor ship at age x. m sub x represents fecundity at age x.

My question is, why is x always "sub x"? There is a an equation R_0 = \sum_{x_first}^{x_last} L_x m_x=population-replacement-rate

What I don't understand is how can R_0 be variable. I see that when R_0=1 there is no growth. And my professor said that this allows us to simply say that r=0=no population growth. But I am thoroughly confused
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't know what the term "survivorship at age x" means, but I have a question for you anyway. What is the index of summation? Is x meant to be the index of summation? It is common to use subscripts in that situation. Is it something like

R_0 = \sum_{x=1}^{100} L_x m_x

If so, then R_0 isn't a variable; it is constant.
 


What I said isn't very clear, sorry. I am doing "life tables" on the rates of population changes over time within age groups. e.g., for whatever reason there may be 100K people alive at age 50, and 75K alive at age 49 given the circumstances with their parents at birth, or other factors that affected that age group during their lives that lowered their age group's population vs another. Survivorship at age x l_x is the percentage of people still alive from a sample of people at their given age.

My problem looks just like that without the "100" and x=1. Instead, it has on top, x last, and on bottom, x first. Meaning x first is the age of first reproduction, and x last is the age of last reproduction.

R_0 = \sum_{x_first}^{x_last} l_x m_x

What I don't understand is how could R_0 be a constant if the value for R_0 changes depending on the growth rate. That is, if the sum of l_x and m_x equal one then there is no growth, but if their sum equals 2.5 then we could say that each individual leaves an average of 2.5 offspring, thus population is growing.
 
Last edited:


So R0= lxfirstmxfirst+ lxfirst+1mxfirst+1+ lxfirst+2mxfirst+ 2+ ... + lxlastmxlast[/math]. R0 is not necessarily a constant but it does NOT depend upon a specific vallue of "x" since it is a sum over all values of x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
956
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K