Why are only two senses transmittable via technology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Algr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Technology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limitations of transmitting senses beyond audio and video through technology. Participants highlight that sound and sight dominate communication due to their ease of transmission and the immediate information they provide. While tactile feedback is explored, such as haptic devices and the concept of "smell-o-vision," these senses remain underdeveloped in media. The conversation concludes that the complexity of other senses, like taste and smell, makes them challenging to replicate technologically.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic sensory perception and communication.
  • Familiarity with haptic feedback technology.
  • Knowledge of media transmission methods, particularly audio and video.
  • Awareness of sensory dimensions and their implications in technology.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in haptic feedback devices for remote operations.
  • Explore the concept of "smell-o-vision" and its historical attempts.
  • Investigate the role of sensory dimensions in media transmission.
  • Learn about current technologies for virtual reality and sensory immersion.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for technology developers, media creators, and researchers interested in sensory communication and the future of immersive experiences.

  • #31
Algr said:
Now that is a stretch.
Yes, but not beyond the point of recognition. Audio transcripts are a thing.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #33
It's a stretch because language is not synonymous with sound. It can be vision or even touch. Of course that dovetails back to the original topic. A braille-pin touchscreen is transmitting touch as technology. But it requires a lot of training to use. I wonder if you could make a video game controller where the button could communicate a braille letter indicating what tool that button activates at the moment.


Linguistically, is that last sentence a question or a statement? Should I have ended it with a question mark?
 
  • #34
Algr said:
I wonder if you could make a video game controller where the button could communicate a braille letter indicating what tool that button activates at the moment.


Linguistically, is that last sentence a question or a statement? Should I have ended it with a question mark?
A statement. :wink: You were stating that you wonder something.
No question mark. People get that wrong all the time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Algr and jbriggs444
  • #35
Smell land taste are pretty invasive senses - they actually require direct chemical interaction.

One can look away from a sight, or turn off a sound - and once gone they're gone. But it's very difficult to turn off a taste or smell once you've started to experience it. It takes time to fade.

You can imagine all sorts of mischief to be had if some complete stranger could put chemicals on your tongue or in your nose - not to mention unsanitary or hazardous.

We're just not ready for that kind of immersion.
 
  • #36
Again, I say Smell-O-Vision.. It's been done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: robphy
  • #37
Vanadium 50 said:
Again, I say Smell-O-Vision.. It's been done.
It has. And it flopped.

One might re-interpret the OP's question to be: why did it not become popular?
 
  • #38
Algr said:
I wonder if you could make a video game controller where the button could communicate a braille letter indicating what tool that button activates at the moment.
Just what every blind video gamer needs.
 
  • #39
Invent porn VR involving all the senses and you'll make billions.

But in terms of simple messaging, think of the #1 classic message ever, FIRE! Do you need more than one sense to get the idea?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Algr
  • #40
anorlunda said:
Invent porn VR involving all the senses and you'll make billions.
Pretty sure I saw something on a cable show called strange sex about this. Not sure about ALL the senses, but the important ones were covered.
 
  • #41
Vanadium 50 said:
Again, I say Smell-O-Vision..
Why? I mentioned it in the first post. (Though not by name.)

DaveC426913 said:
One might re-interpret the OP's question to be: why did it not become popular?
The mechanism was too complex and took the viewers out of the movie. There would have to be something strapped under your nose like supplemental oxygen.
1660705941544.png

That way you would spray tiny amounts that would not build up in the theater.

Then for touch, you get a massage chair that can pivot like one of those motion sensor rides. The story would be about someone with a giant octopus on their back.