What Do Planck 2015 Results Reveal About Power Law Potential Models?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the implications of the Planck 2015 results regarding power law potential models in cosmology. Specifically, it addresses the significance of the ##B## mode values, where ##\ln B = −11.6## and ##\ln B = −23.3## for cubic and quartic potentials are classified as "strongly disfavored," while ##\ln B = −4.7## for quadratic potentials is "moderately disfavored." The conversation highlights the relationship between tensor and scalar perturbations, emphasizing that the B-mode spectrum serves as a nearly direct measurement of tensor perturbations produced during inflation, which remain undetected thus far.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological inflation models
  • Familiarity with tensor and scalar perturbations
  • Knowledge of the Planck 2015 results
  • Basic grasp of power law potential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the implications of tensor perturbations in cosmology
  • Study the significance of B-mode polarization in CMB observations
  • Explore the differences between cubic, quartic, and quadratic inflationary potentials
  • Review the methodology used in the Planck 2015 analysis of inflationary models
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and researchers in theoretical physics who are analyzing inflationary models and their implications on cosmic microwave background observations.

JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156
TL;DR
I am trying to understand why the simple inflationary model with potential ##V(\phi) \propto \phi^2## is disfavored compared to models predicting a smaller tensor-to-scalar ratio.
I am reading Planck 2015 results. In particular, I focused on "Power law potentials" subsection.

The issues I have are

1. I do not understand why the validity of the model can be determined by the value of the ##B## mode.
2. Why the ##B## mode values ##\ln B = −11.6## and ##\ln B = −23.3## for the cubic and quartic potentials , respectively, are regarded as "strongly disfavored" and ##\ln B = −4.7## for the quadratic potential as "moderately disfavored"? What I mean is: what is the threshold value at which we can consider the potential as favored and why?

Thank you! :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Space news on Phys.org
Different inflationary potential shapes predict different relationships between the tensor perturbations and scalar perturbations. The scalar perturbations contribute primarily to the temperature variations across the sky. The tensor perturbations contribute primarily to the polarization of the observed CMB.

The observed E-mode spectrum is dominated by effects after inflation such as structure formation, so it isn't a very good measure of the tensor perturbations.

The large-scale B-mode spectrum is mostly independent of late-time effects, so it's a nearly direct measurement of the tensor perturbations produced during inflation. So far all we've been able to say is that the magnitude of these perturbations is too small to be detected (yet).

Quadratic potentials for inflation typically predict that we would have detected the tensor perturbations by now. This is shown in Fig. 12 in that paper.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
688
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K