Why are quantities called operators

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dpa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators quantities
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of operators in quantum mechanics, particularly why certain quantities are referred to as operators and how they relate to measurements and the uncertainty principle. Participants explore the definitions and implications of operators, measurement actions, and the nature of uncertainty in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the term "operator" arises because measurement involves action on the system.
  • Others clarify that while quantities are not called operators, their representations in quantum theory are, as they operate on the wave-function.
  • There is a discussion about the limit to measurement accuracy, with references to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle as a cause.
  • Some participants question the nature of momentum, suggesting it is a classical quantity internal to a body, while others argue that momentum does not operate in the same way as an operator does.
  • One participant emphasizes that operators are mathematical objects that act on functions, and that many physical quantities have associated operators that satisfy eigenvalue equations.
  • There is an exploration of the uncertainty principle, with some participants seeking to understand its fundamental nature and others suggesting it is a geometric theorem derived from the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of operators and their relationship to physical quantities, as well as the interpretation of the uncertainty principle. No consensus is reached on these topics, and multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the fundamental reasons behind the uncertainty principle and the definitions of operators, with some participants indicating a reliance on mathematical constructs without fully resolving the underlying physical interpretations.

dpa
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Is it because measurement of those quantities involves action on the system.
And is the idea that as light is to be used to measure momentum which effects its position fundamental of QM or is it merely like an analog to understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi dpa! :smile:
dpa said:
Is it because measurement of those quantities involves action on the system.

the quantity is not called an operator …

its representation in quantum theory (in the equations) is called an operator, because it operates on the wave-function

eg, momentum is represented by a derivative, which is obviousy an operator! :wink:
And is the idea that as light is to be used to measure momentum which effects its position fundamental of QM or is it merely like an analog to understand.

no, the fundamental point is that when we measure both position and speed (in the same direction), there is a limit to the accuracy …

the disturbance caused by light (or anything else) is merely a consequence of that :smile:
 
tim,
1. What causes the limit to accuracy.
2. How does momentum operate. I mean momentum is an quantity, clasically internal to body and it's motion.
 
dpa said:
1. What causes the limit to accuracy.

heisenberg's uncertainty principle
2. How does momentum operate. I mean momentum is an quantity, clasically internal to body and it's motion.

momentum is a physical quantity, it doesn't operate
 
sorry, i realize that I had not got something fundamental.
Again,
1. I meant to say how/why uncertainity principle. I mean, why is there uncertainity.
2. So what's an operater.
 
dpa said:
Is it because measurement of those quantities involves action on the system.
And is the idea that as light is to be used to measure momentum which effects its position fundamental of QM or is it merely like an analog to understand.

An operator is a mathematical object that operates in a given function.

Operators are not quantities, but many quantities [itex]a[/itex] have associated an operator [itex]\hat{a}[/itex] and verify the eigenvalue equation ([itex]\Psi[/itex] is a function)
[tex]\hat{a} \Psi = a \Psi[/tex]
Light is not «used to measure momentum».
 
dpa said:
1. I meant to say how/why uncertainity principle. I mean, why is there uncertainity.

because that's how the universe is
 
is that like saying einstein's GR is intuitive/imaginative.
 
is that like saying einstein's GR is intuitive/imaginative.

And i just read somewhere about this.
What are operators/parameters/ observables.
 
  • #10
dpa said:
I mean, why is there uncertainity.
There are a few basic axioms (or principles) in QM, some of them purely mathematical. One of them is that the arena for QM is a Hilbert space of states (with operators acting on these states). Another one is that observables are represented by self-adjoint operators. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is nothing else but a purely geometric theorem that can be derived for any pair of self-adjoint operators. So it follows solely from the mathematical construction.

A physical interpretation for the uncertainty in position x and momentum p can be given as follows: x- and p-representation of wave functions are related via a Fourier transformation; the uncertainty of x (p) is represented by the width of a wave functon in x- (p-) representation; the product of 'width in x times width in p' has a lower bound > 0; a sharper peak in x results in a growing width in p and vice versa.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
859
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K